Head of Pepper Hamilton Alcohol Practice Jumps to DLA Piper
Alva Mather said she's bringing her brewing and distilling clients to her new global firm, but leaving marijuana law behind for now.
April 30, 2018 at 04:30 PM
3 minute read
The leader of Pepper Hamilton's alcoholic beverage industry group has made a move to DLA Piper, after only two years at Pepper Hamilton.
Philadelphia-based Alva Mather said DLA Piper reached out to her about a year ago, but she was hesitant to make a move, given how recently she had joined Pepper Hamilton from Griesing Law. But as her clients look to grow globally, she said, it made sense to join a firm with an international platform.
“Where I see my clients' industry going was the tipping point in deciding to make a move,” Mather said. “Ultimately I need to go where I can best serve my clients and meet the needs that are on the horizon for them.”
Most of her clients are breweries and distilleries, she said. And for a long time their legal needs were regional, but that's changing.
“While craft alcohol has done very well in the states, it's looking overseas for growth,” Mather said, and she didn't want her clients to outgrow the services she is able to offer them. She also represents grocery store chains and other companies that sell alcohol, she said.
Joe Kernen, managing partner of DLA Piper's Philadelphia office, said Mather already has some clients that overlap with the firm's.
“She built this nationally recognized, highly successful practice from scratch,” he said.
Mather noted that DLA Piper is focused on growing its food and beverage practice, and will be able to provide support she needs for her clients. As a result, she said, she will be able to focus more on litigation than her clients' regulatory needs.
Some of Mather's clients are young startup breweries and distilleries, she said, but she does not expect DLA Piper's higher rate structure to be prohibitive to them, as she expects to staff out more of her work to associates and paralegals than she did at her previous law firms.
Kernen, too, said he doesn't expect rates to be an issue for Mather's smaller clients. He noted that DLA Piper has an active practice representing startups in the life sciences and technology industries.
Locally, Mather has been involved in contentious regulatory battles in the industries she serves, having represented a juice company seeking an exemption from the Philadelphia soda tax, and a cannabis business in its application for a grower/processor permit as part of Pennsylvania's medical marijuana program.
Marijuana, however, will not be part of Mather's practice at DLA Piper. She said DLA Piper as a firm has decided not to become involved in the growing cannabis industry, as state and federal marijuana laws differ.
“I hope I will just be delaying my involvement in that industry,” she said. “Eventually the laws will have to come to some better structure than they are now.”
DLA Piper has 56 lawyers in Philadelphia, Kernen said, and is looking to grow in the city, particularly in corporate and finance practices and high-end litigation.
A spokesman for Pepper Hamilton said the firm wishes Mather well.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
Phila., Del. Firms Handling UArts' Ch. 7 Petition Fall Far Below Top Bankruptcy Rates
3 minute readSenior Partners Approach $3,000 an Hour, As More Billing Rate Hikes Expected in 2025
5 minute readFacing Demand Surge, Weber Gallagher Adds 7 Transportation Attorneys in Harrisburg
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
- 2Special Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
- 3The Elliott Management vs. Southwest Airlines Faceoff: Who Won and What Determined the Outcome?
- 4November Court of Appeals Roundup
- 5Trellis Launches Trellis AI, a New Suite of Automated Litigation Tools
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250