A Pennsylvania woman’s lawsuit claiming a haircare line contained false advertising for its supposedly “natural” ingredients can partially continue, a federal judge has ruled.
Plaintiff Rachel Binakonsky filed a class action suit against JM Brands LLC in April 2021, claiming that the company and its Purezero haircare line violated the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, breached express and implied warranty and committed unjust enrichment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
