Concerns surrounding accuracy and confidentiality are prompting multiple organizations that serve Pennsylvania’s lawyers to take a careful look at appropriate ways to use generative AI, but immediate changes to the state’s ethics rules look unlikely.

According to Daniel Siegel, chair of the Pennsylvania Bar Association’s committee on legal ethics and professional responsibility, lawyers are currently debating whether AI is a valid research tool, a concern heightened in the wake of the now infamous case of two New York lawyers submitting a brief filled with false case citations.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]