Even prior to the most recent U.S. Supreme Court term, the crescendo of voices in opposition to progressive policies were becoming a forceful, if not to say cohesive, polyglot. More ominously, what began as mere sound became fury and then metastasized into action, then into policy and finally into law.

We see a confluence of two main factors at work, each tugging in opposite directions: On the one hand, boardrooms reel from increasing environmental, social and governance (ESG) regulations, while at the same time, coordinated attacks from portions of the political class have transformed anti-ESG sentiment into legislation and policy—and in some instances, litigation.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]