Coffee Anyone?: How Sound Legal Conclusions Can Break With Science Under Prop 65
On June 15, the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), which implements and administers California's Proposition 65 program, made an unexpected pivot and proposed a new regulation clarifying that cancer warnings are not required for coffee under Proposition 65.
July 17, 2018 at 02:54 PM
2 minute read
Cheryl S. Chang and Erika R. Schulz of Blank Rome.
Section 25704. Exposures to Listed Chemicals in Coffee Posing No Significant Risk
Exposures to listed chemicals in coffee created by and inherent in the processes of roasting coffee beans or brewing coffee do not pose a significant risk of cancer.
Background
The Litigation
Council for Education and Research on Toxics v. Starbucks
- The defendants' expert performed the wrong type of qualitative risk assessment, focusing on acrylamide instead of acrylamide in coffee, which was necessary to quantify the risk of cancer for this case.
- The method the defendants used to test for acrylamide was a novel scientific technique that had not been generally accepted in the scientific community, rendering it unreliable and inadmissible.
- A second expert provided rationales for an ASRL that the court deemed to be inadequate, lacking scientific support, and not based on sound considerations of public health.
- The defendants' evidence that coffee confers some benefit to human health was not persuasive and was refuted by the plaintiff's evidence.
Litigants' Response and Plaintiff's Challenge to Proposed Regulation
Conclusion
CERT CERT Cheryl S. Chang is a partner in Blank Rome's Los Angeles office who focuses her multifaceted practice on consumer class action defense, consumer financial services, and corporate litigation.
Erika R. Schulz is an associate in the firm's Los Angeles office who concentrates her practice on complex commercial litigation, class action suits, and unfair business practices.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3The 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5First Lawsuit Filed Alleging Contraceptive Depo-Provera Caused Brain Tumor
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250