Broad Pay-Data Proposal, Fought by Business, Fails in California
Business groups fought a bill that would have required many employers to share salary data with the state. The California Chamber of Commerce at one point placed the legislation on its "job-killer list."
August 16, 2018 at 06:36 PM
2 minute read
An Assembly fiscal committee on Thursday killed pay equity legislation that would have required employers to share salary data with the state.
Senate Bill 1284, co-sponsored by the California Employment Lawyers Association, would have mandated that companies with more than 100 workers tell the Department of Fair Employment and Housing how much employees are paid, broken down by job category and gender and ethnicity.
The bill's author, Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson, D-Santa Barbara, said the legislation would give employers “a chance to self-examine their pay practices” while allowing the state to track progress toward equal pay. The reports would have been confidential and not subject to state open records laws.
The bill's introduction followed the Trump administration's decision in 2017 to scrap a proposed rule by President Barack Obama that would have required covered companies to submit employee pay data reports to the federal government.
Business groups fought the bill's passage—the California Chamber of Commerce at one point placed SB 1284 on its dreaded “job-killer list”—arguing that the aggregate pay data would mislead analysts. Pay differences, for example, could be a result of the different numbers of years workers have been employed by the company, not discriminatory reasons, the critics of the bill argued.
Despite the opposition, legislative support from Democrats had moved the bill through both houses this summer—until Thursday. The Assembly Appropriations Committee shelved SB 1284 without explanation.
Gov. Jerry Brown had not taken a public position on the bill, although he did veto similar legislation last year that would have required large employers to submit annual reports on gender wage differentials.
Another gender equity bill by Jackson, SB 826, did advance out of the Assembly's fiscal committee Thursday. That legislation would require California-located companies to have a minimum number of women on their boards of directors.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawsuit alleges racial and gender discrimination led to an Air Force contractor's death at California airfield
7 minute readLawsuit alleges Fox Sports ex-host harassed hairstylist and offered her $1.5M for sex
3 minute readIn Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Courts Demonstrate Growing Willingness to Sanction Courtroom Misuse of AI
- 2The New Rules of AI: Part 1—Managing Risk
- 3Change Is Coming to the EEOC—But Not Overnight
- 4Med Mal Defense Win Stands as State Appeals Court Rejects Arguments Over Blocked Cross-Examination
- 5Rejecting 'Blind Adherence to Outdated Precedent,’ US Judge Goes His Own Way on Attorney Fees
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250