Broad Pay-Data Proposal, Fought by Business, Fails in California
Business groups fought a bill that would have required many employers to share salary data with the state. The California Chamber of Commerce at one point placed the legislation on its "job-killer list."
August 16, 2018 at 06:36 PM
2 minute read
An Assembly fiscal committee on Thursday killed pay equity legislation that would have required employers to share salary data with the state.
Senate Bill 1284, co-sponsored by the California Employment Lawyers Association, would have mandated that companies with more than 100 workers tell the Department of Fair Employment and Housing how much employees are paid, broken down by job category and gender and ethnicity.
State Sen. Hannah-Beth JacksonThe bill's author, Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson, D-Santa Barbara, said the legislation would give employers “a chance to self-examine their pay practices” while allowing the state to track progress toward equal pay. The reports would have been confidential and not subject to state open records laws.
The bill's introduction followed the Trump administration's decision in 2017 to scrap a proposed rule by President Barack Obama that would have required covered companies to submit employee pay data reports to the federal government.
Business groups fought the bill's passage—the California Chamber of Commerce at one point placed SB 1284 on its dreaded “job-killer list”—arguing that the aggregate pay data would mislead analysts. Pay differences, for example, could be a result of the different numbers of years workers have been employed by the company, not discriminatory reasons, the critics of the bill argued.
Despite the opposition, legislative support from Democrats had moved the bill through both houses this summer—until Thursday. The Assembly Appropriations Committee shelved SB 1284 without explanation.
Gov. Jerry Brown had not taken a public position on the bill, although he did veto similar legislation last year that would have required large employers to submit annual reports on gender wage differentials.
Another gender equity bill by Jackson, SB 826, did advance out of the Assembly's fiscal committee Thursday. That legislation would require California-located companies to have a minimum number of women on their boards of directors.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWilson Sonsini Hit With Disability Discrimination Suit by Ex-Assistant
Ex-Twitter Exec Sues for $20M, Says Musk Fired Her as 'Petty Retribution'
Former Hallmark Casting Director Sues Network for Alleged Age Discrimination
3 minute readWho Got the Work: Morgan Lewis Set to Defend X Corp., Elon Musk in ERISA Suit
Trending Stories
- 1Ed Sheeran Meets Led Zeppelin in the Second Circuit
- 2You Too Can Be a Programmer: How Generative AI Can Upskill Any E-Discovery Professional to Write Code
- 3Is Arbitration Working?
- 4New Battleground: Wall Street Law Firms Eye London Growth
- 5Standstill: Court Defers to Legislature on Texas Healthcare
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250