Goodwin Nabs Vinson IP Litigation Partner in San Francisco
Goodwin has hired Darryl Woo, a former head of the litigation group at Fenwick & West until he jumped to Vinson & Elkins in 2014, as a partner in San Francisco.
August 22, 2018 at 01:30 PM
4 minute read
Darryl Woo, a former litigation chair at Fenwick & West who in 2014 jumped to Vinson & Elkins, where he served as co-chair of intellectual property, is joining Goodwin Procter.
Woo will be an IP litigation partner in the firm's San Francisco office. Before moving to Vinson & Elkins three years ago, Woo spent 14 years at Fenwick & West, where he chaired that firm's patent litigation group and served as its overall litigation head for seven years.
“I look forward to collaborating with my California colleagues, as well as those across the globe,” Woo said. “Particularly, I am very excited to be joining Neel Chatterjee and Brett Schuman, together we'll have three first-chair IP trial lawyers in California. I think that is a pretty compelling proposition.”
Schuman, who once led Morgan, Lewis & Bockius' San Francisco litigation practice, joined Goodwin Procter in late 2014 as the firm's second IP partner in the Bay Area. Three years later, Chatterjee, a longtime patent litigator at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, headed to Goodwin Procter's Silicon Valley office.
Douglas Kline, chair of Goodwin Procter's IP litigation group, said his firm has been building out its IP practice in the Bay Area. Goodwin Procter, which re-branded itself “Goodwin” for marketing purposes in 2016, now has about 80 to 100 lawyers involved in its firmwide IP litigation practice, 15 of whom are based on the West Coast, the firm said.
“We have been very fortunate and gratified for the momentum we had in Northern California,” said Kline, who joined Goodwin Procter's Boston office in 2005 from Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, where he chaired that now-defunct firm's patent litigation group. “Big Law litigation has not experienced as much growth over the last six years, even back from the financial collapse, and our experience in IP litigation has continued to have a lot momentum. Our practice reflects that and we are excited to continue to build on that.”
Woo's practice focuses on patent litigation, trade secrets litigation and other complex technology disputes, and primarily involves clients in the biotechnology, information technology, life sciences and semiconductor sectors.
As a veteran trial lawyer, Woo has tried numerous cases to verdict and has first-chair jury trial and U.S. International Trade Commissioner experience. Some of his notable cases include obtaining a $74.7 million jury verdict a decade ago in the Northern District of California on behalf of Asyst Technologies Inc. and representing original online music-sharing service Napster Inc. in IP litigation. (Napster became an online music store in 2011 when Rhapsody International Inc. bought the business from consumer electronics retailer Best Buy Co. Inc.)
Although patent litigation is still an important part of his practice, Woo said his clients are increasingly getting involved with complex technology disputes that “may or may not be tied” to a particular type of IP issue, such as copyrights, patents and trademarks.
Woo also recently served as a technical adviser to the fifth season of “Silicon Valley,” a hit cable television comedy show on HBO about an engineer trying to build his own startup company.
“My interest in China and Asia, in particular, was one of the reasons why people sought me out as technical adviser for 'Silicon Valley,'” Woo explained.
With Woo's addition, Goodwin Procter now has more than 70 lawyers in San Francisco, where the firm set up shop in 2006. Goodwin Procter also moved its Silicon Valley office in April from Menlo Park, California, to nearby Redwood City, where the firm now has more than 70 lawyers.
In April, Goodwin Procter brought on former Fenwick & West private equity partners Scott Joachim and David Johanson for its office in Redwood City, although the firm subsequently saw private equity partner Jared Jensen depart for Sidley Austin in San Francisco.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFaegre Drinker Adds Three Former Federal Prosecutors From Greenberg Traurig
4 minute readAnapol Weiss Acquires Boutique Led by Star Litigator Alexandra Walsh
5 minute readPierson Ferdinand Lures Veteran M&A Specialist From Sheppard Mullin in Silicon Valley
4 minute readAlston & Bird Enters Chicago, Adds Second LA Office With Sidley Austin Trio
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250