Plaintiffs Bar, Labor Advocates Fuel Xavier Becerra's Election Bid
The near-certainty of Becerra's election victory hasn't stopped donors from pouring more than $6.8 million into his campaign since 2017.
October 23, 2018 at 06:46 PM
4 minute read
For a race that will shape how California continues to battle the Trump administration, the contest for California attorney general has been more “blah” than buzzy.
Conventional wisdom is that incumbent Democrat Xavier Becerra will handily defeat Republican Steven Bailey on Nov. 6 and continue adding to the more than three dozen legal challenges his office has pursued against President Donald Trump policies to date. Becerra took 46 percent of the vote in a four-candidate June primary to Bailey's 25 percent.
The near-certainty of Becerra's election victory hasn't stopped donors from pouring more than $6.8 million into his campaign since 2017, with more than $900,000 of that money coming in just between July 1 and Sept. 22 this year, state records show.
With a broad range of duties, from writing ballot initiatives' titles and summaries to defending state laws and drafting certain regulations, the attorney general's office has a potentially enormous impact on numerous interests.
Here's a look at some of the attorney general's biggest donors.
|- Members of the plaintiffs bar contributed tens of thousands of dollars to Becerra's campaign over the last 18 months. Mark Robinson Jr. of Robinson Calcagnie Inc. gave $14,600, an amount matched by Kabateck Brown Kellner partner Brian Kabateck; Elizabeth Cabraser of Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein; Thomas Girardi of Girardi & Keese and others. The Consumer Attorneys of California Political Action Committee made a contribution of $7.300 last month, according to filings with the state.
- Organized labor groups have been the biggest source of donations to Becerra's campaign, followed by the legal industry, according to the election-finance tracking website Dollar Dollar Bill. A coalition of firefighter unions, building trades, real estate agents, prison guards, nursing homes, Sempra Energy and Chevron Corp. spent nearly $400,000 on an independent expenditure campaign supporting Becerra and opposing Bailey prior to the primary. Becerra has been a long-time ally of labor, which is increasingly looking to California for shelter from a hostile Trump administration.
- Seven members of the Southern California firm of Hueston Hennigan gave Becerra a combined $31,000 last month. The firm is active in state investigations in litigation. Hueston Hennigan represents IMDb.com in a lawsuit challenging a California law barring the movie aficionado website from publishing actors' ages.
- Latham & Watkins partner George Mihlsten maxed out with $14,600 in contributions to Becerra's campaign. Mihlsten is a politically connected land-use attorney who supported Becerra when he served in Congress.
- Stuart Liner, managing partner of Los Angeles boutique Liner LLP before its merger with DLA Piper in 2017, also gave the maximum contribution of $14,600. The entertainment and real estate lawyer gave more than $66,000 to the campaigns of California Democrats, including Becerra, in 2017, records show.
Despite the prolific contributions, neither Becerra nor Bailey, a former El Dorado County Superior Court judge, have been seen on the airwaves much since they finished first and second in the primary. During a recent two-month reporting period Becerra's campaign spent more on a single slate mailer than on television ads.
There has been no publicly available polling on the attorney general race and no debates since the primary.
“No one has really asked” for one, said Becerra campaign consultant Roger Salazar.
Bailey, a retired El Dorado County Superior Court judge, has tried to position himself as a law-and-order candidate, an opponent of the state's so-called sanctuary policies on undocumented immigration and a prosecutor who would not be “obsessed with Donald Trump.” But he's been dogged by an ongoing ethics investigation into his tenure as a judge, and his fundraising—just under $500,000 for the two-year election cycle—trails Becerra's by a large margin in a state where all statewide officeholders are Democrats.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPharmacies Accuse GoodRx of 'Inviting Price-Fixing' in Series of Antitrust Class Actions
4 minute read'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Trending Stories
- 1Weil Practice Leaders Expected to Leave for Paul Weiss, Latham
- 2Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 3Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 4Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 5Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250