Multidistrict litigation is a significant part of the federal court system—both in its financial stakes and in the burden it places on judges who are called on to handle vast, tentacled cases that often drag on for years.

It’s a job that requires skillful case management, and the panel that doles out the massive cases has tended to return to repeat players on the bench. That model, while logical, has a problem: Eventually, the judges with the greatest experience handling MDLs will retire, leaving a competence gap.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]