Justice Sallie Mundy. Courtesy photo.
Several Pennsylvania Supreme Court justices were wary of the ramifications of a defendant’s interpretation of a discovery rule during oral arguments Tuesday.
Lamb McErlane partner Maureen McBride, representing defendant Dr. Dong-Joon Oh, argued counsel for a defendant doctor in a medical malpractice action did nothing wrong by agreeing to also represent the plaintiff’s treating physician, who was not a named defendant, in connection to the case.
Maureen M. McBride, partner with Lamb McErlane. (Courtesy photo)
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
