White Superior Court Candidate Accused of Using Race in Targeted Campaign Ads
Candidate Jason Marbutt said the ads are meant to reflect Cobb County's diversity, and his support for that diversity
July 29, 2020 at 06:16 PM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Report
A Superior Court candidate's use of a stock photo featuring two Black men rather than himself in a campaign mailer circulating in Cobb County's minority neighborhoods is generating criticism that it was intended to mislead voters.
Candidate Jason Marbutt's mailer also could run afoul of state judicial ethics canons if it was meant to deceive, a former chairman of the state's judicial watchdog agency says.
Coakley Pendergrass, founder and chairman of the Georgia Community Coalition, said he was "appalled" when Marbutt's mailer was brought to his attention. Pendergrass said he was contacted by minority community members who assumed Marbutt was one of the two Black men depicted and wanted more information about someone they believed was a Black candidate.
Pendergrass said he was stunned to discover the photo was not of Marbutt, who is white, although the candidate was circulating other mailers that did include his picture.
"It was like the candidate was saying, 'Hey, I'm one of you. I'm in your community. … Support me," Pendergrass said.
Pendergrass called it "two-faced."
"Those individuals like myself who have an ear and an interest in what's happening in our community, we are concerned," he said. "To have a person like that in a position to make a decision for or against black or brown people scares me."
Marbutt, a veteran county prosecutor, is running to replace Judge Stephen Schuster, who retires Dec. 31. He faces an Aug. 11 runoff with Marietta attorney Greg Shenton. Cobb County currently has no Black Superior Court judges, but voters elected the county's first two Black judges on June 9.
Marbutt said the mailers with his photo, his family's photo, and the stock photo were sent to voters throughout the county and not based on location, neighborhood or race. He said the stock photo is intended to reflect the county's diversity and his own support for that diversity.
Marbutt didn't respond to questions about endorsements from Cobb's minority communities. "I won the primary with 60,000 votes," he said. "We are a diverse county. Of course I have African American support."
Marbutt garnered 39% of the vote in the June 9 election, falling short of the 50% plus one vote threshold needed to win the election. Shenton placed second in the three-way race with 32.5% of the vote.
Marbutt said he has also sent mailers featuring a stock photo of an elderly white couple that attracted no criticism. "We have a diverse community in Cobb County, and our campaign has tried to show that diversity through our message and our ads," he said. "Anyone who is offended that we would include African Americans on a mailer should take a long look in the mirror."
But state Rep. David Wilkerson, D-Powder Springs, and Cobb County Commissioner Lisa Cupid said they both received Marbutt's mailer corresponding to their race, as did a number of Cupid's constituents. So did Cobb County defense attorney Ashleigh Merchant.
Wilkerson said that, if Marbutt's mailings were not targeted, then the money he paid to a well-known local political mail consulting firm was wasted. "Every campaign consultant targets," he said. But Wilkerson, who lives in an interracial household, also said that he considers the use of one mailer with a stock minority image and other mailers with Marbutt's photo "racist campaigning."
"I told my neighbors and people I'm close to just to be aware of it," he said. "We should move past that. Whenever it comes up, it needs to be called out."
Merchant, a vocal supporter of Shenton's campaign, called Marbutt's mailers "disingenuous."
"It's an effort to try to tell voters he's something he's not," said Merchant, a member of the Georgia Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys' executive committee. Merchant said she received a different mailer with a photo of Marbutt that was sent to voters in largely white east Cobb.
"I think that the fact he [Marbutt] felt comfortable putting his white family and himself on certain mailers, but then he is nowhere to be found on another mailer … was created to deceive the recipients," she said.
Merchant said she located the stock photos online after she noticed the mailer did not identify the two men or include statements endorsing Marbutt.
Merchant said the phrases used in Marbutt's stock photo mailer were also "in stark contrast" to two other mailers depicting Marbutt and his family. Those mailers describe Marbutt as "the candidate to keep us safe" and "the best choice to uphold the rule of law."
Shenton also said the stock photo is misleading. Marbutt "has been very forceful that he will 'protect victims and families,' be 'tough on crime' and 'keep us safe,'" Shenton said. "Then this mailer is sent, as best I can tell, to predominantly south Cobb Democrats … with no photo of him, with a stock photo you can buy for $33, and with a completely different message than he's been hammering home for months."
Chuck Boring, executive director of the state Judicial Qualifications Commission, which polices the state's judges, wouldn't comment on whether Marbutt's use of stock photos in campaign flyers is at odds with the Code of Judicial Conduct.
The code, which applies to judicial candidates, prohibits the use or publication of false or misleading statements about candidates or their opponents. Candidates also bear responsibility for any statement or advertisement circulated by their campaign committees.
But Cartersville attorney Lester Tate—a former JQC chairman who has defended judges facing ethics inquiries—said he is unaware of any JQC opinions addressing the use of stock photos in campaign literature.
"There is no question in my mind" that misleading statements in judicial campaign literature are covered by the state's ethics canons, he said. "There is no question in my mind the commission would be authorized under its rules to take action if they are able to prove it's misleading."
However, judicial ethics rules can't infringe on a candidate's First Amendment rights, Tate added. "Candidates have to have the right to make statements, some of which are horribly misleading."
But while misleading statements may be shielded by the First Amendment, Tate said, "Judges or judicial candidates should not engage in any type of conduct that gives the appearance of impropriety."
"Something that … attempts to portray someone of being a race, creed or color they are not would certainly be misleading, and I think would violate the canons," he said. "However, the ability of the commission to respond might be impaired by the U.S. Supreme Court rulings regarding the First Amendment."
CORRECTION/CLARIFICATION: This story has been corrected to reflect that Jason Marbutt said his campaign mailers were designed to reflect Cobb County's diversity and his own support for that diversity. The story has also been updated to note that Ashleigh Merchant is a supporter of Greg Shenton's campaign.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBaltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
3 minute readFederal Judge Sends Novel Damages Question in Employment Dispute to State Court
5 minute readCounty Reps: Appeal Likely Following State Court's Sales Tax Ruling for Retail Marijuana
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 2A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 3Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
- 4State Bar of Georgia Presents Access to Justice Pro Bono Awards
- 5Tips For Creating Holiday Plans That Everyone Can Be Grateful For
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250