Morrison on Metrics: Sources of help for statistical analysis
Five places to look within your company for help gathering important statistics.
June 13, 2011 at 11:10 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Unfamiliarity with statistics may hold back many general counsel from making more out of their available metrics. Either they do not understand some of the basic ideas of how statistical analysis can help make sense of numbers or they understand, but lack the time or staff talent to use statistics. They cannot take advantage of correlations, slope equations, multiple regression and just plain descriptive statistics.
Fortunately, even if the law department itself is a statistical barrens, at least five groups elsewhere in the company may grow lush statistical talent. With a little bit of sleuthing and some cajoling, a general counsel or law department administrator might be able to borrow the statistical capabilities of a staff person elsewhere in the company for periodic analyses.
The financial function would be the most logical candidate for such a person. The finance group needs to analyze numbers in copious quantities and undoubtedly they have people with MBAs and math degrees able to lend some statistical sophistication to the legal group's efforts.
A second possible pool of talent would come from procurement. Again, this is a group of people comfortable with the analysis of numbers. Statistics fit closely with those interests. Whether the legal team wants to invite them into the tent is a different story.
Third, marketing might not be thought of as a refuge for statisticians, but with the growing importance of data mining, in some companies there may well be people in the marketing department who are adept with finding patterns in large sets of numbers. Among their tools would be statistical concepts and capabilities. Incidentally, the marketers might think more creatively than their legal colleagues about graphics and data visualization.
Another possible source might be those who work on strategic planning, particularly on potential mergers and acquisitions. When you parse and project revenue and market share and intellectual property values, sometimes you find people have aptitude with basic statistics.
It is important to bear in mind that the statistical facility a law department needs to gain more insights from its metrics hardly raises to the level of doctorates and dissertations. Just being comfortable with standard deviations, or even medians as compared to averages, can carry a law department much further in the analysis and understanding of metrics than it would otherwise.
The final candidate in the company for statistical ability could be Human Resources. Whenever there is a layoff of much size someone must first prepare an analysis of disparate impact. To do so, they have to employ some common statistical tools. More broadly, if a company has thousands of employees, many aspects of their careers and evaluations lend themselves to statistical tools.
In short, a law department with quantitative information about outside counsel spending or settlements and judgments or the changing costs of patent protection should recognize that one of the useful tools to pry open the secrets of those numbers are statistics. Having no home-grown statistical competency, they can quite likely find elsewhere in their company someone whose job it is to understand and apply statistics.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStep 1 for Successful Negotiators: Believe in Yourself
Deluge of Trump-Leery Government Lawyers Join Job Market, Setting Up Free-for-All for Law Firm, In-House Openings
4 minute readBallooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
Trending Stories
- 1Special Series Part 4: The Statutory Guardrails Impermissibly Bind Future Legislatures
- 2New York Court of Appeals Blocks Trump Attempt to Stay Friday Sentencing
- 3'Self-Diagnosed Nickel Allergy' Fails to Find Success in Med-Mal Suit, 8th Circuit Rules
- 4Eversheds Sutherland Adds Hunton Andrews Energy Lawyer With Cross-Border Experience
- 5Balancing Judicial Authority: Understanding Sanctions, Severance, and Interferences
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250