Whether willfulness is a prerequisite to an award of a defendant’s profits pursuant to Section 35(a) of the Lanham Act has divided courts for decades and created a confusing body of case law. A split exists not only among district courts of the Second Circuit but also among the circuits. The lack of uniformity in this area of trademark law fosters forum shopping and unpredictable results for trademark owners. By relying on recent Supreme Court intellectual property jurisprudence, the Second Circuit should join the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Circuits. These circuits hold that willfulness is not a condition precedent to an accounting of profits, but rather, one of several equitable factors courts should consider.
The Lanham Act Amendments
Section 35(a) originally provided that:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
