A pattern of “troubling and overly aggressive conduct” pretrial by prosecutors was not enough to persuade a federal judge to dismiss a seven-count indictment in a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act case.

Second Circuit Judge Denny Chin, sitting in the Southern District, acknowledged in U.S. v. Espinal, 10-cr-00905, that the Southern District U.S. Attorney’s Office had withheld exculpatory evidence from defense counsel and attempted to present evidence that would unfairly prejudice the defendant, Jose Espinal.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]