A contempt finding against the United States Polo Association for violating an injunction against the use of a mark similar to the trademark for Polo Ralph Lauren has been vacated by a federal appeals panel.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit said a lower court failed to make a specific, market-based finding when it held the Polo Association crossed the line in using the “double horsemen mark” on the sporty sunglasses it sells.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]