Lloyds kicks off core UK legal panel review
Bank set to refresh line-up of advisers with request for proposals sent out.
August 09, 2016 at 05:49 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Lloyds Banking Group has begun a review of its core UK legal panel, with the results of the process expected by late September, Legal Week understands.
The bank issued firms with a request for proposal last week, and has given them a deadline of next Tuesday (16 August) to respond to the invitation to tender.
Lloyds last conducted a full panel review in August 2014. Historically, the panel appointments have lasted for two years.
Legal Week understands that the bank has told firms it intends to slim down the number of firms on its UK panel during this review.
In a statement, a Lloyds spokesperson said: "The bank's legal panel is determined based on a rigorous and competitive tender process. We have a small number of core firms, who work with us as strategic partners, and then a broader panel of firms whom we engage for certain specialist work. Our panel is reviewed and re-tendered on a rolling basis and is due for renewal later this year."
In 2014, the bank appointed 10 firms, including Linklaters, Allen & Overy, Ashurst and Addleshaw Goddard, to its core line-up.
DLA Piper, CMS Cameron McKenna, Eversheds, Hogan Lovells, Herbert Smith Freehills and Norton Rose Fulbright also won spots.
However, it also cut three firms from the roster: Stephenson Harwood, Osborne Clarke and Berwin Leighton Paisner.
Lloyds is also expected to unveil its UK legal sub-panels later this year. The bank last completed a review of its 16 sub-panels – including restructuring, insurance, group property and financial services – in December 2014.
Other banks to have recently reviewed their legal panel include Barclays, which earlier this summer slashed its legal line-up by around 60%. It cut the total number of firms it works with to 140, from between 350 and 400, with no new firms joining the list.
Ashurst, Hogan Lovells, Simmons & Simmons, Addleshaw Goddard, Eversheds, Bond Dickinson, DWF and Reed Smith were among those retaining spots on the roster, with the first three previously sitting on a 19-strong list of 'preferred firms' appointed in 2014.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRBS to create first-ever flexible lawyer panel as Barclays reviews current providers
SRA decides against Clifford Chance investigation over RBS report complaint
2 minute readEx-Locke Lord partner pleads not guilty to fraud charges after being struck off
Fried Frank City finance head Brinkworth to join Mayer Brown as European leveraged finance head
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250