The pay gap – which firms have the biggest disparity between top and bottom of the equity?
Partner pay figures highlight stark differences between those at top and bottom of lockstep
September 16, 2016 at 12:00 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The lowest paid equity partners at at least five UK top 50 firms take home less than 20% of what the top equity partners receive, Legal Week research has revealed.
Figures provided for Legal Week's annual UK top 50 rankings show CMS, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Gowling WLG, Watson Farley & Williams and RPC all paid the partners at the bottom of their equity less than a fifth of what their top earners received for 2015-16.
Thirty UK top 50 firms disclosed top and bottom of equity figures for the research and, of those, CMS has the biggest pay gap in percentage terms, with the firm's top earner receiving 10 times the pay of the lowest earner. Figures provided by the firm showed that the highest paid member took home £1.126m last year, compared to just £115,000 at the bottom of the equity.
In a statement, CMS – which has 61 offices in 36 countries – says: "The gap is a reflection of our global reach and large geographical spread, and the economics of each individual marketplace in which we operate."
Average profit per equity partner (PEP) at the firm was £443,000, meaning the highest paid member received more than two and a half times that amount.
Freshfields has the next biggest discrepancy between highest and lowest earner, with the firm's top earner receiving more then £2m while the lowest paid partner took home just 16% of that – £335,000.
The £335,000 bottom of the equity figure represents just 22% of the firm's 2015-16 PEP, which at £1.47m was the second highest in this year's UK top 50 rankings.
At the start of this year, Freshfields moved some partners to a lower lockstep ladder as part of a push to ramp up profitability. The firm first introduced a second-tier lockstep ladder running from 10-30 points – compared with the standard 17.5-50 points – in late 2013, but it is understood that its use has increased significantly this year.
Former Clifford Chance managing partner and Jomati Consultants principal Tony Williams says these kind of discrepancies in pay are simply part of the environment partners must accept.
"This is a reflection of the reality of working in a very competitive market, particularly with the influence of US firms. Firms just recognise they have a limited profit pot – if they are overpaying someone they are underpaying someone else," he explains.
Is it better to reward good people who feel under-rewarded, or others who are complaining life is hard?
Williams adds: "It is a challenge – you can use different metrics, make sure you are encouraging and keeping to key principles, but let's get real – if you want to be at the top of the equity at a major magic circle firm you have got to have a £4m-£5m practice. If you cannot deliver that you either have to move down or move out – that's business in a high performance culture. You have to pick the lesser of two evils – is it better to reward good people who feel under-rewarded, or others who are complaining life is hard?"
Elsewhere, Gowling WLG's bottom earner took home £148,000, just over 18% of what its top earner received. The top of the equity figure of £815,000 is more than twice the firm's PEP of £379,000.
At Watson Farley & Williams, its lowest earner took home 17.5% of what its highest paid partner received, with the firm's top earner taking home £1.2m, compared to £210,000 at the bottom of the equity.
Watson Farley co-managing partner Chris Lowe says: "We widened our equity this year and the figures reflect this. We believe a wider range is important, especially for an international firm with equity partners spread across multiple jurisdictions, as it prevents exchange rates being a barrier for talented young partners to join our equity and accommodates high performing partners in our lockstep."
Completing the five firms that paid their lowest earner less than a fifth of what their top earners took home was RPC. The firm's best paid partner netted just over £1m, while its lowest earner took home £200,000 – 55% of the firm's £362,000 PEP figure.
In contrast, a handful of UK top 50 firms have a much narrower equity spread, including three that pay their lowest earning equity partner at least 50% of the firm's top of the equity figure – Mills & Reeve, Blake Morgan and Holman Fenwick Willan.
Mills & Reeve, which this year placed 45th in the UK top 50, paid its highest earner £431,000 in 2015-16, while its lowest earner received 68% of that amount – £294,000.
Blake Morgan and Holman Fenwick Williams both have bottom of the equity figures standing at 50% of their top of equity figure, while a further eight firms – including magic circle players Allen & Overy and Linklaters – paid their bottom of the equity partners at least 40% of their top of the equity figures.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Under Fire for Human Rights Assessment of Saudi Arabia World Cup Bid
5 minute readThe Week in Data Nov. 7: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Trump Win Ignites Global Legal Market: Lawyers Prepare for High Demand & Uncertainty
Netflix Offices Raided by Authorities in Paris and Amsterdam
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250