'A facilitator and challenger' – Top 20 Legal IT Innovators 2016: Allen & Overy's Wim Dejonghe
Legal Week Intelligence, in association with Fulcrum GT, recently published the first edition of its Top 20 Legal IT Innovators report, which profiles the law firm leaders, in-house lawyers and tech pioneers driving change in the legal profession.
October 17, 2016 at 12:05 AM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Click here to download the report from Legal Week Law (free registration required).
Wim Dejonghe joined Allen & Overy (A&O) as a partner in 2001, having previously been a partner at Loeff Claeys Verbeke. In May, he became A&O's senior partner. Before that, he was global managing partner of the firm for eight years.
"I see my role more as a facilitator and a challenger," he says. "A facilitator for the people who come up with innovative ideas and a challenger for those who don't." He points to a range of new products, services and technology at A&O that "either improve delivery of legal services or make it more efficient". He explains: "If you look at it with some perspective, in the end it's about the delivery model and the processes around it.
"The process piece is underrated, because in the end technology allows you to improve the way you deliver services to the client by introducing more efficiencies and taking out human error and replacing it by technology".
He points to several initiatives: the firm's new online legal services platform Aosphere, the legal services centre in Belfast, and Peerpoint. Aosphere is an online monthly subscription service for A&O clients, offering 10 different products targeted at financial institutions: there are currently about 10,000 individual users. Dejonghe cites the example of shareholder disclosure products.
"Each time you buy or sell shares, you have disclosure obligations under a wide range of legislation in different jurisdictions," he says. "That can mean up to 70 disclosure obligations on any given transaction. Aosphere delivers an online tool where you answer five to 10 questions, depending on the complexity, and it will then automatically either send the notifications that you need to send online, deliver the documents that you have to sign to send, or tell you what disclosure obligations you have. For clients, it is quick, cost effective and provides certainty that it's up to date. The funds industry, for example, is very interested."
A&O's Belfast base, which launched in 2011, now has 80 lawyers on client work and total staff of about 450, making it the firm's second largest office after London. "We were lucky with one or two high profile deals to start with, and the rest is history," says Dejonghe. "We now have around 60% of our partners using our Belfast legal services." He would like it to grow further but "our building is full".
In any law firm there are probably 5%-10% of lawyers that come up with ideas. It's a matter of encouraging them, freeing them up and saying: this is a brilliant idea, let's take the risk
Another key innovation steered by Dejonghe is Peerpoint, which enlists the firm's alumni to assist on projects in periods of high demand. It has been operating in the UK since late 2013 and was launched in Hong Kong last year. It now has approaching 160 lawyers.
"Peerpoint is made up of experienced senior lawyers," explains Dejonghe, "who, for whatever reasons, don't want to work full time but have specific experience or knowledge. They work on a project basis, either within A&O or with our clients. We call them in to work on a project, typically for between three months and a year, either sitting with us or with clients.
"Peerpoint caters for a specific client need, it deals with fluctuations in demand within A&O, and it caters to individual needs for individual lawyers, who don't want to work long hours every day. The talent pool is vast: young women with children, musicians, people who want to try a writing career. Lots of very interesting people who have a wider view of the world but are bloody good lawyers."
Although A&O already has 95 US-qualified partners and just under 400 US-qualified lawyers around the world, Dejonghe agrees that "innovations like this will help us crack the US market and build our US practice".
Dejonghe also believes that having different delivery models such as Peerpoint, in combination with the traditional model, enables A&O to gain market share. "For many of the bigger projects we get in from clients," he says, "we deliver legal services and advice through a combination of Belfast, Peerpoint, technology and the traditional law firm. The fact that you can offer that under one brand, one insurance, one reputation, is what is attractive to clients."
He concedes that if you process map all the legal work that A&O does, some of it is commoditised. "There's still a denial in the industry," he says, "that we're all doing that. Every quality firm claims that they're only doing the highest complexity work, which is true, but all of the highest complexity work also contains an element of commoditised services. As long as you deny that is part of what you offer, you will not think about how you can deliver more effectively."
Dejonghe was instrumental in the highly innovative MarginMatrix, a new digital derivatives compliance system launched by A&O in June. MarginMatrix helps major banks deal with new regulatory requirements that came into force for the $500trn over-the-counter derivatives market from 1 September 2016. The system is being deployed as an end-to-end managed service in collaboration with Deloitte, which manages and resources the client outreach and counterparty negotiation process.
"Every country has introduced the rules in a slightly different way, which means the banks have a big problem: they need to renegotiate all these agreements," says Dejonghe. "Rather than renegotiating them one by one and then have a legal opinion, what we have done is to preload the new requirements on the software that we have developed internally.
"We've gone out to the banks and said: you're subject to Singapore, HK, EU and US law, this software will give you the margin within which you have to renegotiate those agreements. So any negotiator can go to their counterparties, plug in the data of his negotiation into the software and it will give a green number or a red light. You don't need the lawyer any more to negotiate."
As a technical and commercial innovation, it has been very successful. "We went to sell it to the banks and it sold out," says Dejonghe. "I cannot disclose the names but we've sold it to all the major banks around the world. At this stage, I don't think there is a product available that competes. It reverses the process: by putting legal advice in the system first and then you negotiate agreements within the system, rather than negotiate a contract and then go for legal advice and ask whether it's fine."
Dejonghe sees the wider development of innovation within A&O as key: "Not all our lawyers are innovators. I don't come up with all these great ideas myself. But what you do is you encourage. In any law firm there are probably 5%-10% of lawyers that come up with ideas. It's a matter of encouraging them, freeing them up and saying: this is a brilliant idea, let's take the risk, investigate further, invest a bit, get some technology, do a dry run in the market to see whether there's any appetite.
"And if it fails, it fails. It's been good marketing. If you go to clients with an idea and it doesn't work, you still demonstrate that you've been thinking about their problems; you're not just waiting for their phonecall to share a problem with you, you're going proactively out into the market."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFemale associates on frank feedback and the mentors spurring their careers forward
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250