Ex-GC Accuses Commodities Firm With All-Male Board of Rampant Gender, Age Bias
The former general counsel of Connecticut-based commodities trader Gerald Metals sued the company Tuesday for gender and age discrimination, saying that she was denied pay increases on par with male attorneys and forced to tolerate a “good ol' boy” work environment.
October 25, 2016 at 05:05 PM
4 minute read
The former general counsel of Connecticut-based commodities trader Gerald Metals sued the company Tuesday for gender and age discrimination, saying that she was denied pay increases on par with male attorneys and forced to tolerate a “good ol' boy” work environment.
In her suit, attorney Roxanne Khazarian accuses Gerald Metals CEO Craig Dean of purposefully marginalizing older workers and particularly older women. The company has regularly held business events at the Playboy Club in London and has never had a female member of its board in its 50-year history, the suit alleges.
According to the complaint, Gerald Metals' legal department is currently staffed by seven male attorneys who are considerably younger than Khazarian, who is 61. Khazarian worked at the company for eight years but was fired in April after repeatedly complaining of discrimination to company leadership, her suit says. She is suing in Connecticut federal court for lost wages and punitive and compensatory damages.
READ MORE: Assault on Wage Gap Forcing Industry to Pay More Than Lip Service
Gerald Metals “has engaged in widespread and systemic age discrimination against its employees, generally, and older female employees, particularly, with respect to its employment practices related to hiring, promotion, leadership opportunities, opportunities for advancement and termination,” states the complaint.
Khazarian—who has had a long career as in-house counsel to major companies—is represented by Stratford, Connecticut-based firm Mitchell & Sheahan. Prior to joining Gerald Metals, she held GC and vice president posts at Ethan Allen, Kaplan and Gibson Guitars.
A call to Gerald Group, which owns the metals unit, was initially placed on hold. A female speaker then picked up and said, “We don't take these calls. Thank you,” before disconnecting.
The suit is the latest to be lobbed by a female attorney against an employer over the issue of pay equity. Sedgwick, Jones Day, and the insurer Farmers Group have all faced similar suits.
Khazarian's complaint points to data about the gender pay gap in the field of law—including a 2013 survey by ALM Legal Intelligence that found male GCs and chief legal officers received annual average cash compensation of $723,700, while females with the same positions are paid more than 20 percent less.
Khazarian says in her suit that she took a pay cut to join the commodities trader, accepting a salary of $260,000. But she says she was promised annual bonuses ranging from 100 to 150 percent of her base salary, which would more than offset the loss.
In reality, her average annual bonus was just shy of 15 percent of her base salary, according to the complaint. Khazarian adds that she only received one annual salary increase—after she threatened to sue the company for discrimination.
The lawsuit alleges that while Gerald Metals sought to push out older women, it gave favorable treatment to “younger, attractive female employees.” According to the complaint, three female employees in their 40s, referred to internally as “Craig's Girls,” were paid more and given bigger bonuses than older women in comparable positions.
These women were also allowed flexible schedules and “assigned to work with the CEO on his personal matters rather than supporting Gerald Group projects,” it adds.
Khazarian also says that she suffered retaliation after complaining about the alleged discrimination to company executives, who she says proceeded to create a “paper trail” of complaints against her for allegedly violating company policies about handling electronic documents. The suit also seems to insinuate that the company may have been responsible for hacking her home computer and email accounts—saying they were compromised after she saw an executive researching “stingray” cellphone surveillance devices.
Things only got worse, she says, after she filed discrimination allegations against the company with federal and state authorities, a prerequisite to taking legal action. “[CEO] Dean spent more time emailing, managing and monitoring Khazarian's activities in the six weeks after her return to work after the filing of her claim of age and sex discrimination, than he spent communicating with her in the prior eight years that she was employed by Gerald Metals as its General Counsel,” the complaint says.
Contact Ben Hancock at [email protected]. On Twitter: @benghancock
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEmployers Scramble to Get Immigration Records in Order Ahead of Trump Crackdown
6 minute read'It's Like They Lynched You:' Law Professor's Discrimination Claim Reaches High Court
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1What Does Ohio Supreme Court's Opioid Decision Mean for Public Nuisance Claims?
- 2Bucking Industry Trend, Sidley Austin Elects Biggest Class of Partners in Firm History
- 3US Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
- 4‘Really Deflating’: Judges React to Biden Threat to Veto New Judgeships Bill
- 53 Incidents Lead to Charges Against the Alexander Brothers; Cousin Remains at Large
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250