New leaders of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer on thinking behind $1bn merger
Arnold & Porter chair Richard Alexander and Kaye Scholer managing partner Michael Solow discuss the new $1bn firm created by the merger
November 11, 2016 at 08:17 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The leaders of Arnold & Porter and Kaye Scholer have known one another for years, but serious discussions about a merger began within the last year, culminating in the union announced Thursday morning that creates a combined firm with close to $1bn in annual gross revenue.
The deal, which saw partnership votes at each respective firm conclude this week, will be effective 1 January 2017. Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer will have about 1,000 lawyers, including 300 partners, spread across nine domestic and four international offices.
The merged firm – the only union so far this year between Am Law 100 firms – will also have deep benches of hundreds of lawyers in New York and Washington, DC. The union represents further consolidation among mid-size and large firms seeking to compete with growing global giants and to bulk up in competitive legal markets amid lacklustre demand for legal services.
Arnold & Porter and Kaye Scholer emerged from 2015 in weakened financial positions when compared with previous years. Leaders at both firms, who declined to make any predictions for their 2016 financial performance, said the future combination was not borne out of short-term revenue falls but long-term strategy.
"We've seen periods of increase and decrease and we have managed through all of those," said Kaye Scholer managing partner Michael Solow. "We wanted this because of what we believe it does collectively for the group and what the firm's clients are seeking."
Arnold & Porter chair Richard Alexander, who will serve as head of the combined firm, said the two firms have shared commitments to pro bono, having a consensus organisation, and to diversity and inclusion. "This combination gives us additional resources, of people, balance sheet, clients and talent to invest in those core values," said Alexander, who in late 2015 assumed leadership of Arnold & Porter.
Through the tie-up, Kaye Scholer, founded in 1917, gains a strong regulatory and litigation practice in Washington, DC. Arnold & Porter, founded in 1946, gets a strong New York presence, mid-market deal work and a well regarded pharmaceutical and life sciences business, said Lawrence Mullman, a partner at Major, Lindsey & Africa in New York, who has recruited for Kaye Scholer.
He praised the merger. "They play to each others' strengths," said Mullman, most recently global leader of the legal recruiting giant's law firm practice.
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer firm leaders confirmed a limited number of cuts in non-lawyer professional positions, but declined to get into specifics. (Kaye Scholer moved some of its back-office operations in 2013 to Tallahassee, Florida.)
"There are going to be a limited number of redundancies," as a result of operational consolidation, said Alexander.
The union is structured as a straightforward merger, said firm leaders, with all lawyers joining the combined firm, unlike other recent deals where one firm dissolves or only some lawyers join the new entity. Alexander said there was "no material debt in the transaction".
The merger talks between both firms were first reported months ago by several news outlets, including The American Lawyer.
Arnold & Porter is currently handling antitrust issues for AT&T, related to its $85bn bid for Time Warner. The massive deal could dissipate, with President-elect Donald Trump having pledged during his campaign that his administration would not approve the mega-merger. Alexander declined to discuss clients but dismissed any potential regulatory practice problems related to Trump.
"Both Mike [Solow] and I believe that when you go through change, change presents opportunities for sophisticated multidisciplinary law firms. We believe there will be a period of shakeout and opportunities, and the synergies of this transaction will not be undermined by the results of this election," Alexander said.
Kaye Scholer, which with 370 lawyers is about half the size of Arnold & Porter, has a significant IP litigation and product liability business representing branded pharmaceuticals, such as those manufactured by AstraZeneca, Novartis and Pfizer.
One distraction at Kaye Scholer has been the December 2015 indictment of Evan Greebel, a former partner at the firm charged alongside pharmaceutical executive Martin Shkreli in an alleged securities fraud scheme. Greebel, scheduled to be tried next year, was a partner at Katten Muchin Rosenman at the time of the alleged fraud. He resigned from Kaye Scholer after the indictment.
The Greebel matter "was never relevant to the discussion", said Arnold & Porter's Alexander.
The law firm merger front was quiet in the third quarter of 2016, but a spate of combinations announced within the last month suggests that year's end could bring about the usual uptick in merger news.
Firm leaders are well aware of slack in demand for high end legal services, and Am Law 100 firms are competing to be one-stop shops to satisfy all client needs, said MLA's Mullman, something he believes factors into many large combinations.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFemale associates on frank feedback and the mentors spurring their careers forward
Trending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250