Addleshaws confirms merger talks with Gateley's Scottish arm
Scottish split-off follows Gateley's stock market listing last year
November 14, 2016 at 03:23 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Addleshaw Goddard has confirmed that it is in merger discussions with Gateley's Scottish arm, HBJ Gateley.
The merger is dependent on the approval of both partnerships, which are set to reach a decision in the coming weeks.
Last Friday (11 November), Gateley confirmed that its Scottish arm, which comprises offices in Glasgow, Edinburgh and Aberdeen, would split off from the English part of the firm in May next year.
The Scottish business has been part of Gateley since 2006, when Birmingham's Gateley Wareing merged with Edinburgh firm Henderson Boyd Jackson. However, when Gateley floated on the London Stock Exchange in June 2015 – the first UK firm to do so – the Scottish offices were unable to follow suit due to regulatory restrictions in Scotland that prevent law firms taking on outside capital.
HBJ Gateley took in revenues of £21.6m in 2015-16, while Addleshaws generated £201.8m. The combined firm would have 11 offices, more than 230 partners, in excess of 1,100 lawyers and combined revenues of around £224m, placing it 15th in the UK top 50 rankings.
Addleshaws managing partner John Joyce said a deal would "enhance each firm's bench strength, give greater flexibility and provide a more robust platform from which to establish stronger market positions across core practice areas, and in the financial services and real estate sectors in particular".
HBJ Gateley senior partner Malcolm McPherson said: "There is a clear and compelling rationale behind this proposal." He added that, "exploratory talks progressed very quickly as the complementary nature of our teams and geographical presence became apparent", and that he was "quietly excited about the potential for creating something rather special".
Addleshaws previously held merger talks with Scottish firm Maclay Murray & Spens, with news of the discussions emerging in November 2015. However, the two sides were unable to come to an agreement and the talks collapsed in early 2016.
The UK top 20 firm has also held talks with US firm Hunton & Williams this year, although discussions slowed after the Brexit referendum in June, as both sides waited to gauge the political and economic fallout of the vote.
A merger between HBJ Gateley and Addleshaws would continue the trend of deals between English and Scottish firms in recent years.
CMS Cameron McKenna and Dundas & Wilson merged in 2014, in a deal that boosted the revenue of CMS's UK partnership by almost 40%. In 2012, Pinsent Masons merged with McGrigors, while Clyde & Co entered the Scottish market in 2015 through a merger with Simpson & Marwick.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Under Fire for Human Rights Assessment of Saudi Arabia World Cup Bid
5 minute readThe Week in Data Nov. 7: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Trump Win Ignites Global Legal Market: Lawyers Prepare for High Demand & Uncertainty
Netflix Offices Raided by Authorities in Paris and Amsterdam
Trending Stories
- 1Jones Day Client Seeks Indemnification for $7.2M Privacy Settlement, Plus Defense Costs
- 2Elections Have Consequences: Some Thoughts on Labor and Employment Law Topics in 2025 and Beyond
- 3Law Firm Associates, Staffers Continue to Put a Premium On Workplace Flexibility, Study Finds
- 42 Carter Arnett Litigators to Join Baker & Hostetler in Dallas
- 5People in the News—Nov. 27, 2024—Flaster Greenberg, Tucker Arensberg
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250