Irwin Mitchell accounts reveal £24m cost of Thomas Eggar acquisition and 59% profits dip
LLP accounts shed light on impact of Thomas Eggar takeover
November 23, 2016 at 07:24 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Irwin Mitchell paid £24m to acquire Thomas Eggar last year, a move that contributed to profits falling by almost 60% during 2015-16, according to the firm's latest accounts.
The limited liability partnership (LLP) accounts, filed with Companies House, show that profit available for division among members fell by 59% from £20.6m to £8.4m during the last financial year.
The accounts state: "The board took a deliberate decision to fast-track the integration of Thomas Eggar, which has led to a short-term impact on profitability in FY16 but which we view as being the right decision longer term."
The trade and assets of Thomas Eggar were acquired for £23.6m plus "acquisition costs" of £533,514 – a total value significantly lower than the £41m revenue figure posted by the southeast firm for 2014-15.
As a result of the takeover, total revenues for the Irwin Mitchell LLP grew 7.3% from £185.6m in 2014-15, to £199.2m. The firm adopted the FRS 102 financial reporting standard during the year, prompting a change to its accounting policy "in respect of valuation of unbilled time on contigent matters". As a result, accrued income has been reduced by £31.4m as of 30 April 2015, while work in progress has increased by £31.7m.
The amount due to creditors increased significantly, from £6.6m to £42.5m, driven principally by £29m in new bank loans and overdrafts.
The Thomas Eggar takeover also contributed to a 24% rise in fee earner numbers, from 1,072 to 1,205, with support staff numbers up 18% from 669 to 787. As a result, total staff costs rose 17% from £60.1m to £70.4m.
The accounts also describe the firm's mechanism for sharing profit with its partners.
The accounts say: "Individual members are awarded a base profit share at the start of the year. In addition, a minimum of 28% of the profit, after the deduction of members' base profit shares for the years, is paid onto a bonus pool that is allocated to members after the end of the financial period."
When partners are made up, they are "required to contribute capital amounting to 30% of notional salary plus any guaranteed profit share within two months of becoming a partner or as and when required by HMRC legislation".
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Under Fire for Human Rights Assessment of Saudi Arabia World Cup Bid
5 minute readThe Week in Data Nov. 7: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Trump Win Ignites Global Legal Market: Lawyers Prepare for High Demand & Uncertainty
Netflix Offices Raided by Authorities in Paris and Amsterdam
Trending Stories
- 1Environmental Fines: Texas Secures Over $100M From Petrochemical Processor TPC Group
- 2US Law Firm Leasing Up Nearly 30% Through Q3, With a Growing Number of Firms Staying in Place
- 3SEC Targets Rising Crypto Financier in $115 Million Securities Fraud
- 4Musk Avoids Sanctions for Skipping SEC Testimony for Rocket Launch
- 5On Advice of DOJ Office, Special Counsel Moves to End Trump Prosecution
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250