BP names new top lawyer following former GC Bondy's departure
Oil giant promotes long-serving in-house lawyer ahead of UK panel review
January 08, 2017 at 07:10 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
BP has appointed a new group general counsel (GC) with the promotion of long-serving in-house lawyer Eric Nitcher, following former GC Rupert Bondy's departure to Reckitt Benckiser.
Nitcher, who has spent 26 years at BP, was previously GC for BP America and senior associate GC for disputes and regulatory matters.
BP announced Nitcher's promotion internally last month, and he started in his new role on 1 January. He will be based in BP's London office, heading up an an in-house team that numbers around 320 lawyers.
During his time at BP he has worked out of both the US and UK. In the US, Nitcher served as special counsel and chief of staff to BP America's chairman and president and was associate GC for BP's US and Latin America businesses.
Highlights for Nitcher during his time at BP have included working on the 2003 formation of TNK-BP, a joint venture with Russian oil producer TNK. Linklaters took the lead role for BP, with Jones Day advising TNK.
Nitcher also played a key role on the settlement of claims stemming from the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, advising on the settlement of both US government claims and private claims that BP faced following the disaster.
His predecessor Bondy, who had been group GC at BP since 2008, resigned from his position last October to join FTSE 100 consumer goods company Reckitt Benckiser at the end of the year.
BP's UK panel review is scheduled to take place this year, after the last review in 2014 saw Linklaters, Freshfields, Herbert Smith Freehills, Norton Rose Fulbright, CMS Cameron McKenna, Pinsent Masons and Olswang retain their positions following a reverse auction for spots on the roster.
Addleshaw Goddard, Simmons & Simmons and Ashurst all won first-time places, with Fieldfisher the only firm to lose out.
The previous review, in 2011, saw Norton Rose and Olswang pick up first-time appointments.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFTC Settles With Security Firm Over AI Claims Under Agency's Compliance Program
6 minute readPeople and Purpose: AbbVie's GC on Leading With Impact and Inspiring Change
7 minute read'You Can’t Do a First Draft of Common Sense': Microsoft GC Jon Palmer Talks AI, Litigation, and Leadership
Contract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
- 2State Bar of Georgia Presents Access to Justice Pro Bono Awards
- 3Tips For Creating Holiday Plans That Everyone Can Be Grateful For
- 4Red Tape, Talent Wars & Pricey Office Space Greet Firms Entering Saudi Arabia
- 5A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Becoming Clerk of the Forum
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250