Olswang's management pay drops by nearly 40% as CMS UK partners see profits for distribution fall 18%
Olswang and CMS file LLP accounts ahead of three-way merger with Nabarro
January 16, 2017 at 09:47 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Olswang's management team saw its combined pay fall by more than a third in 2015-16, as its merger partner CMS Cameron McKenna saw profit available for division among members plunge 18% during the same period, according to the firms' latest filings with Companies House.
Both firms have filed their accounts for the most recent full financial year as they gear up for their three-way merger with Nabarro on 1 May.
The filings show Olswang's management team took home a combined £5.4m during 2015-16, compared with £8.5m in 2014-15 – a drop of nearly 37%.
The team includes four designated members: chief executive Paul Stevens, senior partner Mark Devereux, Brussels managing partner Dirk Van Liedekerke and litigation partner Richard Bamforth, as well as a number of other senior members and managers. Olswang declined to comment on how the composition of this team compared with the previous year.
The accounts show Olswang made a £300,000 profit on the disposal of its Berlin office, which it sold in September 2015 to Greenberg Traurig. Total sale proceeds came to £502,000, while costs relating to net asset disposals amounted to £202,000.
The firm reported turnover from the discontinued operations of £5.6m during the year, but acknowledged the sale would have a short-term impact on revenue.
It stated: "While these changes will reduce the firm's revenues in the short term, we expect no significant impact on our business or any disruption to the implementation of our strategic plans and longer sustained growth."
Overall, Olswang's turnover fell by roughly 11% from £126m to £112m, while operating profit dropped 6% from £37.5m to £35.3m.
The firm's highest paid member was allocated £759,000, up 32% from the previous year's figure of £576,000. Total lawyer and staff numbers fell 12% from 616 to 543, with staff costs dropping 9% as a result to £38m. The average number of members fell 12% to 99 from 113.
The accounts show the firm halved its net debt from £10.6m to £5.3m during the year, with debt falling 76% in the past two years, from £22m at the end of 2013-14.
According to the accounts, Olswang previously overstated its profit before partner remuneration for the year ending April 2015 by £1.7m, with this figure corrected in the latest accounts.
Meanwhile, merger partner CMS Cameron McKenna has filed accounts that show group operating profit and profit available for division to partners both fell in 2015-16, despite a marginal increase in revenue.
Profit for division among members plunged 18% from £61.7m to £50.3m, with group operating profit falling 6% to £74.1m from £78.7m.
A spokesperson for the firm attributed the fall in profits to costs incurred as a result of a small partnership restructuring.
In a statement, the firm said: "This reported fall in profits was due to an exceptional item. We made a decision last year for a small amount of restructuring within our partnership that, under accounting conventions, required the accelerated recognition of costs that would have otherwise fallen in the next three years. Overall, our balance sheet remains healthy and our strong cash position has allowed us to repay surplus capital held in the business and end the year in a strong position."
CMS UK's highest paid partner took home £860,000 – 9% more than the 2015 figure of £788,000. Overall drawings and distributions increased by nearly 30% to £53.1m, with capital contributions from members falling from £5.6m to £2.8m.
Staff numbers for the group rose marginally to 1,633, with associated staff costs climbing to £81.7m from £79.5m. Member numbers nudged up two to 198.
The accounts show total group turnover for CMS Cameron McKenna edged up from £259.2m to £263.3m, of which the overwhelming majority – £218.8m – came from the UK. The firm made a £1.7m foreign exchange gain.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Firms Rising? The Law Firms with the Largest UK Market Share, 2024
Eversheds Top Earner Pay Surpasses £3 Million, LLPs Show
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner Touts Steady Revenues After Pre-Merger Losses in UK
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Moving Goalposts of Overtime Exemption: Texas Judge Invalidates 2024 Salary Threshold Rule
- 2New Research Study Predicts Continued Growth for Generative AI in Legal
- 3Litera Acquires Document Automation Startup Office & Dragons
- 4Patent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
- 5Transforming Dispute Processes in Law: The Impact of Large Language Models
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250