Linklaters lines up with US firms on Reckitt Benckiser's $17.9bn baby formula company acquisition
Trio land mandates as UK-based maker of Durex and Dettol agrees to buy Mead Johnson
February 10, 2017 at 08:12 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Davis Polk & Wardwell, Linklaters and Kirkland & Ellis have secured mandates as Reckitt Benckiser agrees to buy US baby milk formula company Mead Johnson for $17.9bn (£14.4bn).
Reckitt Benckiser is set to acquire Mead Johnson for $90 per share in cash, valuing the company's equity at $16.6bn. Including Mead Johnson's net debt, the total value of the transaction is $17.9bn.
Davis Polk is acting for UK-based Reckitt Benckiser, according to sources close to the deal. The company makes health, hygiene and consumer products, such as Durex and Dettol, .
Davis Polk's team includes New York corporate partners Harold Birnbaum and John Amorosi.
Kirkland is advising Mead Johnson on the deal. The Kirkland team is being led by London corporate partner David Holdsworth, who joined the firm's London office last year from Linklaters, as well as New York corporate partner Jonathan Davis, Daniel Wolf, Willard Boothby and David Fox.
New York executive compensation partner Scott Price also advised, with help from New York tax partner Dean Shulman. Debt financing matters were handled by London partners Daniel Borg and Neel Sachdev. The team also comprised New York competition partner Ian John, City competition partner Paula Reidel and New York capital markets partner Tim Cruickshank.
Linklaters is advising on English law banking matters for Reckitt Benckiser.
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton corporate partners Ethan Klingsberg and Paul Tiger, as well as securities litigation partner Meredith Kotler, are representing Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley as financial advisers to Mead Johnson.
The news comes after ex-BP group general counsel Rupert Bondy left the oil giant to join Reckitt Benckiser last year.
Last year, Kirkland also scored an advisory role on the $8.8bn (£6.6bn) purchase of Hewlett Packard Enterprise's (HPE) software business, by UK technology company Micro Focus.
Kirland represented Micro Focus and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer advised HPE on the deal.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Republican Who Might Become FTC's Next Chair Blasts Democratic Commissioners' 'All Mergers Are Bad' Mindset
7 minute read
Inside Track: How 2 Big Financial Stories—an Antitrust Case and a Megamerger—Became Intertwined
The Law Firms Generating 8-Figure Fees on the Year's Big Ticket UK Deals
3 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1Business Breakups: Why Business and Commercial Cases Are Well-Suited to Mediation
- 2Prosecutors Drop Charges Against Ex-Miami Commissioner and Attorney
- 3Pennsylvania Modernizes Trust Administration With New Directed Trust Statute
- 4Farella Hires Former AUSA, Jan. 6 Prosecutor
- 5Dougherty Jury Returns $2M Verdict
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
