Dealmaker: Slaughters' Richard Swallow on Rolls-Royce, wheeling Boardman through an airport and advising Britney Spears
Fresh from advising Rolls-Royce on a corruption probe, Slaughters investigations co-head discusses the highlights of the case
February 17, 2017 at 08:21 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Richard Swallow, investigations co-head and City disputes partner at Slaughter and May, has spent the past year advising Rolls-Royce on the Serious Fraud Office's (SFO) probe into allegations of bribery and corruption at the company. Earlier this month, Rolls-Royce agreed to pay £671m to settle cases in the UK and US. Swallow led the firm's team alongside fellow disputes partner Jonathan Clark.
In December, Swallow was also instructed by British American Tobacco (BAT) to work on its investigation into allegations of bribery and corruption. Other case highlights include advising British Airways on its defence of multiple claims for damages in excess of £1bn, in relation to the alleged air cargo cartel.
What were the highlights and key challenges of acting for Rolls-Royce on the SFO corruption investigation? Coordinating, with co-counsel Debevoise, a huge and complex global investigation – and ultimately resolution – with authorities in the UK, US and Brazil. This was all conducted in the full glare of the media, and (in the UK at least) under the new and developing Deferred Prosecution Agreement procedures. This all presented significant logistical and strategic challenges, which were made easier however by a very professional and experienced client team.
Why did you become a litigator? I enjoy problem solving, strategy and winning.
What's the closest you have come to doing something other than law? Medicine – every other member of my family is a doctor, and I did sciences at A level.
Why work in a law firm rather than become a barrister? I considered I was better suited to the collegiate team environment of a law firm, as opposed to being a sole practitioner barrister.
Which judge or barrister do you most admire and why? Laurie Rabinowitz QC – combination of huge brain and very nice chap.
What's been your proudest professional moment/moment in court? In litigation for JP Morgan arising out of the collapse of Enron, persuading an English judge to find that Arthur Anderson's accounting for various Enron structured finance transactions was correct.
…and worst day on the job? Inviting Nigel Boardman to play a game of tennis while on business in Washington DC, during which he ruptured his Achilles tendon – I had to push him in a wheelchair through Dulles airport onto the plane home.
What advice would you give to young litigators starting out? On every case, aim to become a master of the facts – it is obvious but all legal analysis and strategy builds on the facts.
What's the best/worst thing about being a litigator? Winning/losing.
What's the funniest thing you've ever witnessed in court? When representing the Test and County Cricket Board at the Sarfraz Nawaz v Allan Lamb ball tampering libel trial, watching counsel try to explain to the judge and jurors the art of reverse swing bowling, with the aid of a dozen cricket balls and post-it notes.
How do litigators differ from deal lawyers? Litigators tend to enjoy conflict more.
How much do you conform to the spiky litigator stereotype? That stereotype is, or should be, outmoded.
What's the toughest ethical/moral dilemma your job has ever presented you with? Whether to agree to act for Britney Spears on an insurance claim, given my views on her music. Resolved in her favour.
What most annoys you about the legal profession? Boring lawyers, and lawyers not willing to give a view.
What's your strongest characteristic…and worst trait? I'm fiercely competitive – my strongest and worst trait.
What's the worst corporate event you've ever attended? Too many to mention.
Most memorable case you ever have worked on and why? Acting for Kimi Raikkonen in his dispute with the Lotus team. After the case concluded, Kimi kindly invited me to the Singapore Grand Prix and I spent the race in the pits with the Ferrari team.
Do you see yourself having a career outside law? No. Time outside the law will always be for my wife, family and friends.
What's your favourite TV depiction of a litigation lawyer? Harvey Spectre in Suits or Denny Crane in Boston Legal.
What's your favourite item of clothing? My ski boots.
What's your favourite cheese? Mont d'Or.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Under Fire for Human Rights Assessment of Saudi Arabia World Cup Bid
5 minute readThe Week in Data Nov. 7: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Trump Win Ignites Global Legal Market: Lawyers Prepare for High Demand & Uncertainty
Netflix Offices Raided by Authorities in Paris and Amsterdam
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250