Squire Patton Boggs sees partner profits jump 15% as revenue rises 6%
Firm posts average partner profits of nearly $1m
March 30, 2017 at 08:37 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Squire Patton Boggs edged total revenues closer to the $1bn (£0.8bn) mark and posted average partner profits of nearly $1m in 2016, in what Steve Mahon, the firm's global managing partner, called its "best year ever".
Gross revenue grew by $54m (£43m) to $983m, a 6% increase over 2015. Revenue per lawyer was up 3% to $670,000 (£537,000).
Profits per partner last year jumped 15%, reaching $975,000 (£782,000).
In a statement, Mahon said the firm's cross-border compliance, regulatory, transactional and litigation practices had especially contributed to its rising fortunes.
"We have spent the past several years making investments aimed at building a platform that helps our lawyers deliver results for clients, and also attracts new clients and talent to the firm," Mahon said. "We are seeing those investments pay off."
Squire Patton Boggs was formed in 2014 with the combination of Squire Sanders, a firm with roots in the UK and Ohio, and Patton Boggs, which was based in Washington, DC. Last February it grew again, bolstering revenue with the acquisition of 55-lawyer San Francisco-based firm Carroll, Burdick & McDonough.
Carroll Burdick's former chairman Matthew Kemner told The Recorder last week that 12 of the firm's 13 equity partners have stayed at Squire. "I don't know a single one of the 12 who hasn't been working on legacy Squire projects," he said.
The combined firm exceeded 2016 budget goals by almost 10%, Kemner added.
Overall, Squire Patton Boggs' headcount grew by 40 lawyers in 2016, to 1,466 worldwide. The firm counted 172 equity partners – 26 more than it had in 2015. The non-equity partnership shrank by 34 full-time equivalent positions, to 308. A firm spokesman said the changes in partnership totals represented natural attrition and promotions from non-equity to equity status.
Besides the merger, Squire initiated other internal changes in the US. The Patton Boggs' legacy lobbying reputation in Washington resurged when former Republican House Speaker John Boehner, an Ohioan, joined the firm in September.
The firm also hired top lawyers from Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co and Starwood Hotels & Resorts.
Frederick Nance, a partner in Cleveland, became the firm's US managing partner this year, while Jane Haxby in the UK leads the European portion of the firm. Squire is organized as a Swiss verein, so finances and management can remain separate between markets.
In court, Squire saw several wins – for its clients and the firm itself.
A federal judge's ruling protected the firm from a challenge to a settlement its predecessor firm had made with Chevron Corp, regarding legal work done related to a long-running dispute over pollution in Ecuador's rainforest. Squire Patton Boggs was represented by lawyers at Morvillo Abramowitz Grand Iason & Anello.
Squire lawyers convinced a judge to overturn a $655.5m (£526m) judgment against the Palestine Liberation Organization related to the financing of terrorist groups.
In domestic matters, the firm earned the contract to independently monitor the police force of Ferguson, Missouri, following federally mandated reform. That work is capped at $1.25m (£1m) over five years, or no more than $350,000 (£281,000) in a single year.
|Income in focus
Even with its recent merger history, the income increase that Squire Patton Boggs reported for 2016 is unusual. Net income – meaning the total profits divided among equity partners last year – grew by $44.5m (£36m), or 36%, to $167.5m (£134m). Setting aside new income used to compensate promoted equity partners, which previously would have been considered an expense, Squire converted nearly half its new revenue directly into profits.
John Niehoff, an accountant with Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, who looked at the numbers and does not work for Squire, called the margin increase "outstanding". Profitability increases such as Squire's typically relate to a major contingency win or a dramatic shift in the utilisation of lawyers firmwide, he said.
"An overall average increase in contribution from all lawyers in the firm, including lateral additions, has contributed to this year's financial results," a firm spokesperson said when asked for further explanation of the margin increase. The profitability was "not materially impacted by any contingency fees, cost-cutting initiative, exchange rate changes" or changes in the management of the partnership, the spokesman added.
Two years ago, Squire's partner compensation ratio was the highest in Big Law, with top-earning partners making 30 times more than the lowest earners as of two years ago. In 2016, the firm reported that its highest-earning partners received a more modest 12 times that of the lowest-compensated partners, including non-equity. A 12-to-1 partner compensation ratio is close to what's typical among Am Law 100 firms.
Squire's expansion plans continue this year. The firm acquired a four-lawyer intellectual property boutique in Palo Alto two months ago. The firm also added three IP lawyers in Germany before the end of the year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLexisNexis Responds to Canadian Professor’s Criticism of Lexis+ AI
When Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
Environmental Fines: Texas Secures Over $100M From Petrochemical Processor TPC Group
3 minute readBaker McKenzie Accepts Defeat on Australian Integration With Firm's Asia Practice
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Commission Confirms Three of Newsom's Appellate Court Picks
- 2Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 3GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 4'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 5Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250