Slaughters to send six-strong City competition team to Brussels as Brexit 'accelerates' plans
Firm to ramp up Brussels base as Brexit highlights need to provide 'international product'
April 03, 2017 at 05:09 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Slaughter and May is planning to relocate six competition lawyers from London to Brussels this year, amid a spike in work prompted by last year's Brexit vote.
The magic circle firm's latest partner promotions, announced last week, included City competition lawyer Kerry O'Connell, who will move from London to Brussels before the end of the year.
O'Connell, who has already spent a significant part of her career building her practice in Brussels, will be followed to the Belgian capital by five City competition associates, as the firm ramps up its response to the Brexit vote.
"Brexit has created many challenges – it is a critical time. We have to invest and make sure we provide an international product to our clients," said London-based competition head Philippe Chappatte. "We have been developing a 'triple hub' strategy for a number of years. What Brexit has done is accelerate our plan to move lawyers to Brussels.
"The plan was always to carry on building our Brussels office. We think it is already a premier tier one operation; it punches way above its weight and we will carry on building it up as well as Hong Kong/Beijing and London."
Slaughters currently has three partners based in Brussels. In total, the firm is aiming to have 20 lawyers on the ground by the end of 2017.
Brexit has created many challenges – we have to invest and make sure we provide an international product to our clients
O'Connell's promotion this May will take the firm's global competition partner headcount to 11, almost double the six the practice had five years ago. In total, Slaughters now has more than 75 competition lawyers, after the addition of around 15 associates per year in recent years.
Chappatte, who took over leadership of the practice in 2009 and was re-elected in 2011, commented: "What will change over the coming years is that we will have more partners based in Brussels for their entire careers, rather than rotating out of London."
Chappatte explains that when the UK officially exits the EU, major merger filings will not just be done at the European level but also with the UK authorities.
"The rationale for building Brussels is to ensure that our footprint in Brussels is large enough to handle large cases out of Brussels," he said. "Some clients will want EU merger cases handled out of the Brussels office post-2019. We will achieve this not only through having four partners in Brussels and the requisite number of associates, but also by ensuring that [London competition partners] Bertrand Louveaux, Claire Jeffs and I, who have substantial EU competition practices, maintain our profile in Brussels post-Brexit."
Slaughters is also looking to capitalise on Brexit's implications by boosting its trade capabilities. "We are increasing our knowledge of what trade agreements involve," said Chappatte. "It is not an area many magic circle law firms know much about – we are looking at opportunities to develop here."
In future, Chappatte suggests that the Brussels practice will be "more European and less British". The firm's three partners there are Belgian, Finnish and Irish, while incoming partner O'Connell has applied for Irish nationality.
Last year, Legal Week reported that Slaughters lawyers, alongside others from top UK firms, were applying to join the roll of solicitors in the Republic of Ireland ahead of the Brexit vote.
Chappatte comments: "All lawyers in our group have had the opportunity to register in Ireland, but nobody needs an Irish practicing certificate today; it is costly and unnecessary. Over time, our Brussels practice will become more and more European and less and less British."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'New Circumstances': Winston & Strawn Seek Expedited Relief in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readFTC Lauds Withdrawal of Proposed Indiana Hospitals Merger After Leaning on State Regulators
4 minute read'Water Cooler Discussions': US Judge Questions DOJ Request in Google Search Case
3 minute readNot a Shield, but a Weapon? Blue Cross Accused of Antitrust Practices
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1What to Know About Naming a Law Firm
- 2Texas Shows the Way Forward in Resolving Mass Tort Gridlock
- 3Ninth Circuit Rules on Inherent Authority and FRCP 37(e)
- 4Where CFPB Enforcement Stops Short on Curbing School Lunch Fees, Class Action Complaint Steps Up
- 5Appellate Court's Decision on Public Employee Pension Eligibility Helps the Judiciary
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250