With Laws for Autonomous Cars, It's Pedal to the Metal
America's race to put "self-driving" cars on the road is expected to accelerate in 2017 as more state and federal regulators come out with rules governing their testing and operation. Industry lawyers should get in the driver's seat.
April 19, 2017 at 03:12 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
|
America's race to put “self-driving” cars on the road is expected to accelerate in 2017 as more state and federal regulators come out with rules governing their testing and operation.
Industry lawyers should get in the driver's seat.
“You'll see more of a partnership in the development of regulations than you have in the past,” says Christine Soares, a partner at Cozen O'Connor in Cherry Hill, New Jersey. “For carmakers, making sure they're involved in those different task forces, either at the federal or state level, is going to be important for them.”
Autonomous vehicles aren't just the brainchild of Tesla and Google; most of the major automakers hope to sell them in the next few years. Regulators are scrambling to keep pace with the technology. Since 2012, 10 states have enacted regulations for driverless cars, either by law or through executive orders, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. But the regulations aren't all alike. Some states have required licensed drivers to be behind the wheel, some don't. Some address testing and studies, while others govern liability.
Next year could see a push for greater consistency, especially after the U.S. National Highway Traffic Administration in September announced a set of voluntary guidelines for autonomous vehicles, including a model policy for states. There is a definite difference in the roles between the states and federal and local governments in this, but the key is because it's a completely new frontier and a new way of looking at things, the state, local and federal governments are going to have to work together—much like they did when vehicle laws came out when automobiles were invented,” says Anne Teigen, policy specialist at the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Critics have safety concerns, despite assurances from industry leaders that autonomous vehicles would make the roads less dangerous. At least one person has died in a Tesla vehicle. The NHTSA's safety guidelines prompted Silicon Valley entrepreneur George Holtz to halt sales of his proposed $999 self-driving device.
That said, the federal rules could be more favorable to carmakers under President-elect Donald Trump, who has vowed to reduce regulations.
And in some states, auto manufacturers already have taken a front seat. In California, a coalition led by Google and Uber have pushed back against regulations they considered too stringent and onerous. In Pennsylvania, a task force for autonomous vehicle regulations includes representatives from Uber, which already has cars on the road in Pittsburgh. Uber knows a thing or two about “breaking into the industry and defining what they are,” Soares says. “And then having the laws and regulations follow their own definition.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKelly Hart Secures $27M Trade Secrets Misappropriation Final Judgment in Fort Worth Trial
3 minute readAuto Dealer Software Upstart Accuses Entrenched Competitor of 'Attempted Monopolization'
4 minute readElon Musk Has a Lot More Than a 'Tornetta' Appeal to Resolve in Delaware
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250