Should I Disclose a Past Drinking Problem to My New Law Firm?
There is something to be said for being a straight shooter.
May 17, 2017 at 12:40 PM
5 minute read
Dear Patrick:
When lateraling from one employer to another, do you see any downside to not disclosing a past drinking problem?
—A Beltway lawyer
Dear Beltway lawyer:
Short answer: Yes, I do. Before I lay out some reasons why I actually think it might make sense to disclose a past drinking problem, however, let me start by saying that it is ultimately a person and situation-specific issue. Different people will arrive at different conclusions about what is right for them, and I can respect that. I have worked with some law firms that are wonderfully supportive of their lawyers who have struggled with substance use and mental health problems, and I have worked with other law firms that don't make such individuals feel supported in the least. Some in our profession (and society) remain harshly and ignorantly judgmental of those who have struggled with addiction, so I very much understand the impulse that one may have to conceal or otherwise keep such matters private.
All of that said, here are some of the reasons why I tend to come down on the side of disclosure:
The burden of inauthenticity: Let's face it, our profession likes to drink—a lot. There are almost certainly going to be times when you are expected to be in alcohol-centric situations, and it is reasonable to believe you will be asked, possibly with regularity, if you'd like a drink. For some, it may feel inauthentic—almost like living a double life—to constantly be offering vague, elusive or varying explanations for why they are not partaking. If being open about having overcome a problem with alcohol helps resolve that inner tension, as well as reducing the peer pressure to drink, the resultant and broader benefits to one's overall mental health could be substantial.
The threat to your recovery: If your drinking problem is in the past—and that's where you want to keep it—you need to be doing things on an ongoing basis to support and nurture your recovery and well-being. Therefore, you need to carve out adequate time for those self-care activities, and to otherwise be placing greater emphasis on a healthy lifestyle than many of your colleagues are likely to understand. If you are not able to clearly and openly communicate that you have needs around your well-being, you may find yourself not giving those needs the primacy they deserve. Boundaries will erode, balance will disappear, and you may find yourself succumbing to the old and unhealthy habits that facilitated the onset of your problem drinking in the first place.
The value of candor: There is something to be said for being a straight shooter. Honesty goes a long way toward cultivating a positive perception of your professional integrity and personal character, even—and perhaps especially—when it means revealing something about yourself that others may perceive as a weakness or flaw. While it's understandable to fear a prospective employer taking a dim view of your past struggles, you shouldn't underestimate the flip side of the coin: the value that some might place on your willingness to be honest and open. Also, lots of lawyers have drinking problems, but far fewer have done the hard work to overcome them. Doing what you needed to do to get and stay sober is something to be proud of, and points to an inner reservoir of courage and determination that should be viewed as an asset.
Finally, on this point, if your new employer finds out that you actively misled or deceived them about your history, I don't need to tell you that the result could be disastrous, especially if the reason for lateraling in the first place was directly related to your drinking. Under those circumstances, hiding the truth is an ill-advised strategy that will leave you with a thoroughly unstable and insecure foundation upon which to grow at your new firm.
The importance of a good fit: If you are considering a job at a new firm or other employer, don't minimize the importance of whether they are a good fit for you. All of you. In the pie chart of our lives, our employers often—and unfortunately—get the biggest slice. If you can't be your honest and authentic self in that environment, or if there is a significant disconnect between what you need to do to support your recovery and what you need to do to be part of that firm, I would suggest you keep looking. If a particular employer makes you legitimately uneasy about disclosing your past drinking problem, or being “found out,” maybe it's just not the right place for you. Trust me, the opportunity to practice law and live an integrated life that doesn't undermine your well-being is out there. It's worth taking the time to find it.
Have a question? Send it to [email protected], and I'll see you back here in two weeks.
Patrick R. Krill is the founder of Krill Strategies, a behavioral health consulting firm focused exclusively on the legal industry. Go to www.prkrill.com for more information.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAvoiding the Great Gen AI Wrecking Ball: Ignore AI’s Transformative Power at Your Own Risk
6 minute read'If the Job Is Better, You Get Better': Chief District Judge Discusses Overcoming Negative Perceptions During Q&A
'A Template' for Religious Accommodation: Attorney Gives Insight to $12M Win Over Employer's COVID-19 Vaccination Policies
Trending Stories
- 1Paul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Continues Finance Practice Build
- 2Chancery: Common Stock Worthless in 'Jacobson v. Akademos' and Transaction Was Entirely Fair
- 3'We Neither Like Nor Dislike the Fifth Circuit'
- 4Local Boutique Expands Significantly, Hiring Litigator Who Won $63M Verdict Against City of Miami Commissioner
- 5Senior Associates' Billing Rates See The Biggest Jump
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250