$7.225 Million Award Against Managed Care Provider for Alleged Treatment Delay
A jury has awarded more than $7 million to a plaintiff who alleged that his HMO delayed treatment for his hand injury.Facts and Allegations Terry…
May 31, 2017 at 05:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
A jury has awarded more than $7 million to a plaintiff who alleged that his HMO delayed treatment for his hand injury.
Facts and Allegations
Terry LaRue, a freelance sports videographer, was insured under a Health Net IFP CommunityCare HMO plan administered by Health Net of California Inc. Health Net contracted with an independent physician association, Accountable Health Care IPA, that agreed to provide medical services to members enrolled in the HMO.
Mr. LaRue sustained a Bennett's fracture – a fracture of the base of the first metacarpal bone – of his left hand while working on an assignment near Denver. He subsequently was referred to an orthopedic surgeon to perform surgery the next day.
According to Mr. LaRue, however, that surgeon would not accept his insurance and by the time he found a surgeon to perform surgery, his fracture had partially healed and consolidated in a malposition. As a result, the metacarpal had to be re-fractured and pinned. Mr. LaRue claimed that the delay in receiving surgery caused permanent injuries to his hand.
Mr. LaRue sued Health Net, Accountable, and Dr. Birinder Brara. He alleged that the actions of Health Net and Accountable constituted a breach of contract and that Accountable and Dr. Brara's failure to timely refer him to an appropriate hand surgeon constituted medical malpractice. He also alleged that Accountable's actions constituted negligence in violation of the California law that mandated that managed care providers adhere to standards of “ordinary care.”
Health Net and Dr. Brara agreed to settle with Mr. LaRue, and the case proceeded to trial against Accountable.
Result
The jury found that Accountable was negligent and that this negligence was the cause of Mr. LaRue's harm. It also determined that Mr. LaRue's damages totaled $7,225,000.
The case is LaRue v. Health Net of California, Inc., No. BC566095 (Cal. Super. Ct. L.A.Cty. May 4, 2017). Attorneys involved include: Robert S. Gianelli; Gianelli & Morris; Los Angeles, CA, for Terry J. LaRue; Rene J. Kern Jr.; The Kern Law Group PC; Los Angeles, CA, for Terry J. LaRue; Richard D. Carroll; Carroll, Kelly, Trotter, Franzen, McKenna & Peabody; Long Beach, CA, for Birinder S. Brara; Craig de Recat; Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP; Los Angeles, CA, for Health Net of California Inc.; Michael D. McClelland; McClelland Advocacy Ltd.; Sacramento, CA, for Accountable Health Care IPA.
FC&S Legal Comment
This report is based on information that was gleaned from an article that published by VerdictSearch's sister publication, The Recorder; Berbay Marketing & PR; and an interview of plaintiff's counsel. Defense counsel declined to contribute.
To see the full detailed report from our ALM partner, VerdictSearch, please click here.
Take the guesswork out of your claims settlements.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250