What to Expect From the Reshaped National Labor Relations Board
With President Donald Trump's nominees on their way to the Senate, labor and employment attorneys say the National Labor Relations…
June 28, 2017 at 06:01 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
With President Donald Trump's nominees on their way to the Senate, labor and employment attorneys say the National Labor Relations Board is poised to roll back regulations with its first Republican majority in nearly a decade.
Management-side attorneys and anti-union advocates are hopeful Obama-era regulations will be scuttled in favor of business-friendly practices.
Trump recently picked Los Angeles-based attorney William Emanuel of Littler Mendelson and Marvin Kaplan, a lawyer who works at a division of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, for two open board seats. They would join Republican Chairman Philip Miscimarra and Democratic members Mark Gaston Pearce and Lauren McFerran.
While hundreds of pending board cases, the labor and employment community is expecting high-profile rulings from the board to be addressed with the new makeup. Here's a rundown of three top issues experts and stakeholders are watching.
|Who Is Considered a Joint-Employer?
A case that up-ended a 30-year precedent defining a joint-employer relationship set off opposition from the business community. Such a relationship between two or more businesses essentially means both determine or share responsibilities, such as pay, job duties and schedules and therefore are responsible jointly for meeting protection laws for employees.
The case—Browning-Ferris Industries v. National Labor Relations Board—is being considered before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. District. A panel of judges heard argument in March.
The case stemmed from a group of workers in California who, attempting to organize, argued that the company was a joint employer with its contractor. The NLRB revised its joint employer test in the case, which previously held that the potential joint employer had to be direct and immediate as to employment actions.
Under the new standard, the board has a two-part test that allows the control to be direct, indirect or reserved right to control. Some major companies hope that the NLRB will revert to the previous standard in this case. Groups that support the ruling said it allowed more workers to come to the bargaining table.
|Are Graduate Students Employees and Can They Unionize?
Last year, the board overturned a ruling that denied collective bargaining rights to graduate students and teaching assistance under the National Labor Relations Act, in a case involving Columbia University. This issue has been swirling in the news with Yale University graduate students holding high-profile fasts to demand unionizing rights and other cases pending. The NLRB oversees graduate student unions on private campuses. State law governs public campuses right to collectively bargain. This decision overturned a previous 2004 ruling. Private universities are against the current standard and have delayed bargaining attempts on certain campuses.
|Who Can Form Unions? Are Micro Units Legal?
Businesses also are hoping the board's decision in Specialty Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center of Mobile will be overturned. The decision essentially made way for fragmented unions to form.
When filing an election petition with the NLRB, those seeking to unionize must identify a group of employees. Micro-units decrease the size of the unit to make it easier to organize for workers. The decision found that a bargaining group could be made up of a group of employees who share a community of interest. Employers argue that it would leave the company bargaining with only part of the workforce.
Before the 2011 decision, the NLRB previously disapproved of the micro-units. The chairman's words could foreshadow where the board would settle on this matter in the future with the new pro-business nominees. Miscimarra has argued that the case was wrongly decided and affords too much “deference to the petitioned-for unit in derogation of the mandatory role that Congress requires the board to play 'in each case'” when making bargaining determination.
Related Articles:
|- Littler Mendelson's William Emanuel Gets Trump Nod for NLRB
- What Labor Lawyers Are Saying About Marvin Kaplan, Trump's First NLRB Pick
- Trump's DOJ Switches Sides in Key Labor Case, Now Fights Class Actions
- Dozens of Companies Await SCOTUS Ruling on Workplace Class-Action Bans
- When a Boss 'Hopes,' Employees Know Exactly What That Means
Erin Mulvaney, based in Washington, covers labor and employment. Contact her at [email protected]. On Twitter: @erinmulvaney
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIn Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
6 minute read‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
3 minute readFormer Cleveland Meteorologist Sues TV Station for Alcohol Use Disorder Discrimination Claims
Employers Scramble to Get Immigration Records in Order Ahead of Trump Crackdown
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250