Latham set for London litigation push as firm plans to double City team headcount
US firm targets major City disputes expansion with white collar identified as priority
October 04, 2017 at 04:58 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Latham & Watkins has set out ambitious targets to ramp up its presence in the London litigation market, as the US firm continues to make inroads in the City.
The Global 100 leader, which has made a string of corporate and finance hires in London in recent months, has now set its sights on a similar push in disputes, and is aiming to double the number of lawyers in its London litigation department during the next three to five years.
The growth targets would see London litigation headcount increase from about 30 to 60, with partner numbers rising from 11 to about 22.
The expansion plans, already on their way to fruition with this week's hire of CMS UK litigator Ian Felstead, come on the back of the appointment of Stuart Alford QC (pictured above) and Oliver Browne as co-chairs of the City disputes practice earlier this year. The duo took up their roles following the exit of former chair Simon Bushell to Signature Litigation in January.
Alford joined Latham last October from the Serious Fraud Office (SFO), where he was head of the fraud division, while Browne has been at the firm for 12 years, making partner in 2012 after joining from Allen & Overy in 2005.
Alford said: "We are aiming to grow the team to 20% of London office headcount, which would effectively mean doubling in size within the next three to five years."
Currently, approximately 70% of Latham's global revenues come from transactional practices, with disputes representing the other 30%. The long-term goal is to see the London office reflect this proportion.
Overall, Latham has 330 lawyers and 75 partners in London. The firm has three core groups within its litigation department – international arbitration, complex commercial litigation and white-collar crime. Competition sits with both corporate and litigation.
Latham is prioritising growth in the white-collar space, said Alford. "White-collar is a good example of where we want to grow – that's a priority for us. In the medium term we want this practice group in London to hold its own with the other players in the market."
Other recent City litigation recruits include Martin Davies, who joined in January from Quinn Emmanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, and arbitration partner Sophie Lamb, who joined from Debevoise & Plimpton last year.
The firm is also eyeing up more partners with regulatory experience, after last year taking on the Competition and Markets Authority's (CMA) director of mergers, Jonathan Parker.
"We have a desire to build our regulatory enforcement experience in London, Frankfurt and Paris, particularly in the context of Brexit," Alford said. "We will need more CMA expertise, more SFO expertise, and people who can cope with regulations in each jurisdiction.
"We want to grow the balance between transactional work and litigation. The strategy for the firm is to increase the litigation component. We have recognised as a firm there are opportunities we are not exploiting. In London, there are more significant deals – there is a real focus placed on that."
Latham recently retained its top spot in the Global 100 revenue rankings for the third year running, having made significant gains across all metrics in 2016. Revenue increased for the seventh consecutive year, climbing 6.5% to pass $2.8bn on the back of significant investment in London and Germany.
In addition to taking on the magic circle in the London M&A market, the firm also wants to be viewed as on a par with the top firms in Germany, such as Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Hengeler Mueller.
This February, chief operating officer LeeAnn Black told Legal Week sister title The American Lawyer that the Brexit vote had had no impact on the firm's strategy, and that London remained "a critical market" for the firm.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGoing, Going, Gone! Florida Lawyers Up to Bat After Baseball Shatters Sales Records
JAMS Launches Initiative to Leverage AI Technology in Dispute Resolution
Federal Judge Preliminarily Approves $10M Settlement Against Citgo's 'Marriage Penalty' in Pensions Benefits
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250