Law Firms Confident in Risk Management, but Ongoing Challenges Remain
A survey by American LegalNet found that many law firms are continuing to invest in risk management technology in the face of growing risk-related legal liabilities.
October 04, 2017 at 02:44 PM
3 minute read
Technology can often be a catch-22 for law firms. Sure, it allows them to reach new heights of efficiency and cost savings, but it also increases their risks of cyber threats, inadvertent disclosures and human error.
Law firms are becoming increasingly aware of such risks—but that doesn't mean it's getting any easier to manage them.
According to American LegalNet's “2017 Risk Management Survey” of IT and legal directors, CIOs and CTOs, and other managers at 186 U.S.-based law firms, though law firms have high confidence in their ability to address risk, many still face ongoing management challenges.
Over 75 percent of surveyed respondents said their firm was capable of addressing and mitigating risk in their business. Slightly over 50 percent, described their firms' risk as coming from cyberthreats, malware, ransomware and viruses, while 22 percent cited human error and negligence.
But despite this confidence, 49 percent noted that malpractice suits against their firms increased “significantly in recent years,” while 44 percent were unsure if such suits would grow or decrease. What's more, almost 58 percent noted their firm is planning to invest more over the next 12 months in risk management technology and processes.
When asked about the underlying causes of malpractice suits against their firm, around 36 percent cited human error and negligence, while almost 35 percent said they did not know.
Erez Bustan, CEO of American LegalNet, said that the growing amount of malpractice suits against law firms was due to the fact that many had to manage risk on multiple fronts—not just cybersecurity and negligence, but also compliance risks stemming from M&As, mobile devices and other areas.
He also noted that law firms' investment in risk management processes and technologies “is going to be ongoing,” in part because their clients are demanding they meet specific security standards or deploy specific cybersecurity technologies.
What's more, insurance companies may require law firms to also have a set of policies and technologies in order to be covered for liability risk, Bustan added.
Given their responsibilities in addressing risk, more law firm employees are also becoming more aware of their firm's risk management operations. The survey found that slightly less than 29 percent of respondents, for example, did not know who was in charge of their risk management program in 2017, a drop from 38 percent in 2016.
It became less likely, however, that general counsel were in charge of the risk management program. Only 19 percent of law firms turned to their GC to oversee risk management, down from 38 percent in 2016. Separate compliance or risk management heads were the second most likely, 16 percent, to oversee such programs, followed by CIOs or CTOs, at 14 percent.
Bustan explained many law firms were moving to grow their in-house risk management teams, either by spinning them off into entirely separate departments or putting them under the purview of the IT department. “Today law firms are creating more and more positions to handle their risk,” he said.
Rhys Dipshan can be contacted at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllChair of Montgomery McCracken Decamps for Morgan Lewis
New Year, New Am Law 100: Challenges Await These Newly Merged Law Firms
7 minute readA Crystal Ball You Can Bank On: Popular Social Media Attorney Makes Legal Predictions
Clifford Chance Hikes Partner Pay as UK Firms Fight to Stay Competitive on Compensation
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1People in the News—Jan. 2, 2025—Eastburn and Gray, Klehr Harrison
- 2Deal Watch: Latham, Paul Weiss, Debevoise Land on Year-End Big Deals. Plus, Mixed Messages for 2025 M&A
- 3Bathroom Recording Leads to Lawyer's Disbarment: Disciplinary Roundup
- 4Conn. Supreme Court: Workers' Comp Insurance Cancellations Must Be Unambiguous
- 5To Avoid Conflict, NYAG Hands Probe Into Inmate's Beating Death to Syracuse-Area DA
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250