Watchstone denies Slater and Gordon's accusations of fraud during ill-fated Quindell deal
UK company files defence in the High Court against Australian-listed law firm
October 13, 2017 at 11:13 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Watchstone – the UK company formerly known as Quindell – has denied any wrongdoing in the sale of its professional services division to Australian-listed law firm Slater and Gordon.
The claims outsourcing company filed its defence in London's High Court yesterday (12 October), in response to the law firm's claim served in June.
Slater & Gordon's UK subsidiary is seeking up to £637m in damages over allegations of fraud.
In its defence, Watchstone argued there were no matters that the law firm was not aware of from "their due diligence and Quindell's disclosures" during the completion of the deal.
It also revealed that prior to the sale, five months of "rigorous due diligence" was carried out by Slater and Gordon, at a cost to the law firm of $51.6m (£31.7m).
Watchstone further alleged that after the acquisition, Slater and Gordon "boasted publicly" that they had carried out their own calculations and judgements based on their own due diligence.
The defence also drew attention to the fact that Slater and Gordon gave notice of a claim against Watchstone shortly before the end of the deal's warranty period, while it was under "serious financial and external pressures that had nothing to do with Quindell/Watchstone".
Shortly after the Quindell deal was announced in March 2015, the insurance company was placed under investigation by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) over its previous accounting practice.
Slater and Gordon – which in 2007 was the first ever law firm to go public – entered the UK market with the £53.8m takeover of personal injury firm Russell Jones & Walker. This was followed by a flurry of acquisitions, including the ill-fated Quindell deal.
The firm has since agreed a recapitalisation package with Anchorage Capital that gives the lenders ultimate control of the UK business. In September, Legal Week revealed that the firm had moved 41 of its UK partners out of its partnership prior to this.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's Second Term Spurs Unusual Alliances Between US and European Law Firms
3 minute readGoodwin to Launch Brussels Office With Quinn Emanuel Antitrust Partner
3 minute readDespite Brexit, UK Lawyers Still Dominate on Big EU Antitrust Lawsuits
7 minute readHow to Litigate Before the EU’s Top Court, the European Court of Justice
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 2'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 3Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 4‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 5State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250