Karen Sargent
Karen SargentWhile Richard Susskind urges law schools to address the academic and skills-based education to equip law graduates, he also addresses job-seeking…
October 18, 2017 at 05:04 PM
3 minute read
While Richard Susskind urges law schools to address the academic and skills-based education to equip law graduates, he also addresses job-seeking young lawyers and extols them to ascertain how prospective law firm employers are planning and adapting to the future practice of law. Does a firm have what it takes—the business plan, the forward-thinking adaptation to client needs, the openness to technological advancements—to move the firm, and hence the careers of their attorneys, forward?
In this excerpt from Susskind's book, he offers insightful advice to young lawyers applying for a job, directing them to ask a few pointed questions to uncover a firm's preparations for the practice law in the future. Two of those key inquiries include whether a firm has articulated a long-term strategy and whether the firm is incorporating or has a plan to incorporate technology.
Whether the young attorney is seeking a job with a large, global firm or a smaller, local law firm, these questions are relevant and valid to ask. A young attorney should always try to learn how well a firm is managed as a business. Susskind aptly points out that any going concern should have a business plan. Attorneys who cannot demonstrate that their firm has thought through a business plan will not be equipped to tweak their plan for changes in the legal market. However, in probing about a long-term strategy the young attorney needs to demonstrate an open communication style. Key will be asking the questions in a non-confrontational way. There is no quicker way to lose a job opportunity than appearing to be an arrogant inquisitor.
As important to the young attorney should be whether the prospective firm is incorporating technology into their legal work. As I work with students, I see students who have grown up with technology, leveraging it to save time and gain access to new knowledge. What a great opportunity to work for a business or firm that embraces technology and can get the most out the new associates. Firms that are not adapting to technological advancements will be sorely underutilizing the young associate workforce. I would caution the young lawyer if a firm is slow to use technology, this might signal long hours and old thinking.
While no law firm is immune from unexpected changes in our world such as the international and national economy or local laws and regulations, it is only through forward-thinking preparation that firms will improvise, adapt and overcome such changes and thrive. A smart young lawyer, in addition to posing these questions to their prospective employer, also needs to be prepared in the interview to answer for himself the same questions posed by Susskind to be able to contribute value to his firm in the future.
» Susskind's Job Interview Advice for Law Students Misses Mark, Career Pros Say
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Everything From A to Z': University GCs Tested by Legal, Financial, Societal Challenges
6 minute read'A Horrible Reputation for Bad Verdicts': Plaintiffs Attorney Breaks Down $129M Wrongful-Death Verdict From Conservative Venue
How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250