Marcia Shannon
Marcia ShannonA law firm (or any organization, at that rate) with a strategy that includes pursuing a competitive advantage in the marketplace and embracing…
October 18, 2017 at 04:59 PM
2 minute read
A law firm (or any organization, at that rate) with a strategy that includes pursuing a competitive advantage in the marketplace and embracing technology is one that positions itself for long-term success, as Richard Susskind states in this excerpt of “Tomorrow's Lawyers.” However, he suggests that students and new lawyers might want to ask these questions in the interview process, even to the point of suggesting they ask to see the firm's strategic plan in writing. While a lawyer with a significant book of business who is seeking a new platform might ask these provocative questions, I believe it is unrealistic for someone with little leverage to ask them, particularly in the interview process. While pointing out important factors for the observant and wise student/recent graduate to consider in choosing a potential employer, Susskind misses an opportunity to help the “aspiring lawyer” find ways to gather this information appropriately. If I could rewrite this section for him, I would consider including some of the following questions:
- Where do you see this practice in five years? What do you think are some of the factors that will influence the law in this area in the coming months/years?
- How does your firm differentiate itself from its competitors?
- How would you describe the firm's culture? Has it changed since you started here?
- If you could change one thing about your firm, what would it be?
- What is the biggest challenge your firm faces?
- If you were interviewing again as a law student, what questions do you wish you had asked during the recruitment process?
- How do you see technology impacting your practice or firm?
- Is the firm planning to grow or is it currently the right size? If growth is expected, how is the firm planning to do so?
- Are there some practices within the firm that have seen growth recently? What do you think accounts for that growth?
Susskind's important message in this section should not be ignored. Law firms are often 10 years behind their counterparts in the business world. In this ongoing challenging climate, they can't afford to be anymore.
» Susskind's Job Interview Advice for Law Students Misses Mark, Career Pros Say
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Everything From A to Z': University GCs Tested by Legal, Financial, Societal Challenges
6 minute read'A Horrible Reputation for Bad Verdicts': Plaintiffs Attorney Breaks Down $129M Wrongful-Death Verdict From Conservative Venue
How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250