Rodney Abstone
Rodney AbstoneThe concepts addressed in this chapter of Richard Susskind's latest book are quite relevant in the landscape of today's law firms.…
October 18, 2017 at 05:03 PM
3 minute read
The concepts addressed in this chapter of Richard Susskind's latest book are quite relevant in the landscape of today's law firms. While I certainly agree that the advice Susskind offers to new lawyers is important to their future success, I do not agree that these are proper questions to be asked by a first-year in an interview. As someone who works closely with law firm leaders (most often with partners), I am inclined to believe that those ranks would, indeed, perceive a first-year candidate to be “objectionable or subversive.”
On the topic of a firm's long-term strategy, I agree with Susskind's suggested question in theory, but disagree in practice. A first-year should never expect to be given access to or made aware of any portion of a firm's strategic plan. These are questions I advise partners to pursue when considering a new firm. A first-year's more immediate concern should be about the firm's mentoring practices, professional development, retention strategies, and brand strength in specific practice areas. Questions about the firm's long-term strategic plan might appear a bit premature from a stranger who hasn't earned the right to those answers.
I agree that it is important to inquire about the role technology plays within the firm. However, I would caution a new lawyer to not allow this to be a disqualifier, as it is not likely to have much impact on the firm's overall standing and brand in the legal community. Often, partners who provide new lawyers with the best mentoring do not always have the technological background themselves.
I would suggest staying away from the question about designing a new firm from scratch. The prospective employer needs to feel that the candidate is impressed with them and excited about where the firm is currently and the opportunities it presents; that the candidate is going to be an immediate asset culturally and intellectually. Talking about how the firm would “fix” itself may send an opposing message.
Instead, a new lawyer should focus on a few key topics, such as the firm's mentoring program, professional development opportunities, associate retention practices, brand strength in specific areas of practice and diversity initiatives. The interview is the candidate's opportunity to showcase their interpersonal and social skills (something many partners lament about being missing from new lawyers) and demonstrate what makes them more valuable to the firm than their competition.
» Susskind's Job Interview Advice for Law Students Misses Mark, Career Pros Say
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Everything From A to Z': University GCs Tested by Legal, Financial, Societal Challenges
6 minute read'A Horrible Reputation for Bad Verdicts': Plaintiffs Attorney Breaks Down $129M Wrongful-Death Verdict From Conservative Venue
How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250