Legal advice for £4.99? New online service launches with input from Macfarlanes, Withers and Farrers
Shoosmiths also among firms providing content for new site offering cut-price answers to frequently asked legal questions
October 19, 2017 at 08:56 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
A new online service offering legal advice for as little as £4.99 has been launched, with contributions from lawyers from UK top 50 firms including Macfarlanes, Withers and Shoosmiths.
LexSnap – the brainchild of Swiss lawyer Tetiana Bersheda (pictured) – gives users access to a online library of answers to frequently asked legal questions, as well a series of video 'tutorials' on subjects such as alternative dispute resolution, immigration and wealth planning.
Answers to the frequently asked questions are priced at either £4.99 or £9.99, with package deals for multiple queries also available. The answers to the questions have been provided by lawyers at one of the site's three partner firms, which Bersheda declined to name.
Meanwhile, the video tutorials, which are free to view, have been provided by Macfarlanes immigration head James Perrott, Shoosmiths family partner Peter Morris, Withers divorce and family partner Suzanne Kingston, and Farrer & Co knowledge lawyer Sara Hunt.
Clients can also submit new questions, which are sent out to the site's network of lawyers, who then have a 48-hour window to offer a fixed fee to answer the question. LexSnap is paid a commission on new questions answered through the platform, as well as an introduction fee for referrals when the lawyer is paid by the client.
The platform also offers a lawyer recommendation service, which will aim to match the client's given budget with a suitable adviser.
Bersheda – who is also the sole partner of Swiss boutique Bersheda Avocats – said: "LexSnap is really about making people aware that if they cannot afford to go to a traditional law firm, they can get legal advice. I have seen the challenges for a client in creating a relationship with a lawyer and I thought technology could aid that.
"It is different from just Googling information, because it has been provided by professional lawyers. We only work with lawyers that are registered in England and Wales and we have created a network that will grow. We will look at the areas of expertise that we need and the geographical area they are situated in."
Perrott, who has contributed a number of video tutorials on immigration law and the consequences of Brexit, added: "The idea is that the site sets out typical situations that individuals often come up against, which require legal advice. They can therefore consult the site to obtain answers to these scenarios, which are provided by qualified legal advisers.
"If an individual goes onto the internet to look up the relevant immigration law which applies to their particular situation, what is there is often impenetrable and it is difficult to work out how the law applies to that person's case. The site is not a replacement for a lawyer, but should enable people to be better informed about their legal options before taking advice.
"It will be very interesting to see how the market responds to it because it is certainly an innovative way of delivering legal advice."
- LegalWeek Connect, which will focus on new thinking in the worlds of law and business, is taking place on 29-30 November at London's Institution of Engineering and Technology. Click here to find out more.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's Second Term Spurs Unusual Alliances Between US and European Law Firms
3 minute readGoodwin to Launch Brussels Office With Quinn Emanuel Antitrust Partner
3 minute readDespite Brexit, UK Lawyers Still Dominate on Big EU Antitrust Lawsuits
7 minute readHow to Litigate Before the EU’s Top Court, the European Court of Justice
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 2'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 3Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 4‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 5State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250