Political Party Loses to Eminem in Suit that Spawned Viral Courtroom Video
The rapper has won his copyright breach suit against New Zealand's conservative National Party who used a version of his song in one of their campaign ads
October 19, 2017 at 04:12 PM
3 minute read
“Best believe somebody's paying the Pied Piper” goes a line from Eminem's Oscar-winning rap song “Lose Yourself.” According to New Zealand's high court, that somebody is the conservative National Party, and the Pied Piper is Eminem himself.
The Guardian reports that the rapper has won his copyright breach suit against the political party for using a version of his song in one of their campaign ads. Justice Helen Cull ordered the National Party to pay 600,000 New Zealand dollars ($415,000) plus interest to Eminem's publisher, Eight Mile Style. The amount was considered to be a “hypothetical license fee” that would have been paid to Eminem had the Party received permission to use the original.
The ad (seen below, along with the official video for Eminem's song) ran 186 times over an 11-day period during the 2014 election campaign. The National Party had bought the track, “Eminem Esque,” to use with the ad from a company called Beatbox. That company, in turn, had bought the license from music library Labrador, which is based in California.
Garry Williams, representing Eminem, told the court that “Lose Yourself” was an “iconic musical composition … a jewel in the crown of Eminem's catalogue.”
Lawyers for the National Party attempted to argue that “Lose Yourself” wasn't much of an original work during a two-week hearing in May that, according to The New Zealand Herald, often verged on the farcical as defense lawyers played different tracks to try and establish a difference between copying and imitation. One video of the proceedings, showing lawyers standing or sitting stock still as the Eminem track played in the courtroom went viral.
Justice Cull ultimately rejected the National Party's arguments in her 132-page decision. “The distinctive sound of 'Lose Yourself' is not limited by a 'melodic' line, but is a combination of the other instruments, particularly the guitar riff, the timbre, the strong hypnotic rhythm and the recurring violin instrumentation and the piano figure,” she wrote. “'Eminem Esque' sounds like a copy and is a copy of 'Lose Yourself.'”
Adam Simpson, a Sydney-based attorney who represented Eight Mile Style and “Lose Yourself” writers Jeff Bass and Luis Resto, said the ruling set “a major precedent” for copyright infringements. “This decision is a warning to soundalike music producers and their clients everywhere.”
National Party president Peter Goodfellow expressed disappointment with the ruling, but found it reassuring that the High Court recognized the due diligence the party took in seeking “extensive advice … from industry professionals” before purchasing the “Eminem Esque” track. “The judgment has also found that the party in using the track did not act flagrantly or in a manner which justifies the party being further punished,” he continued. The National Party has already lodged a claim against the suppliers and licensors of “Eminem Esque.”
As of press time, Cull has not ruled who will pay legal costs.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOpenAI Tells Court It Will Seek to Consolidate Copyright Suits Under MDL
3 minute read'Rampant Piracy': US Record Labels File Copyright Suit Against French Distributor Believe
5 minute readKeker Secures Defense Win for EDA Software Company Real Intent in Synopsys Copyright Infringement Case
Saying 'No Answer Is Required' Is Insufficient Under Fed Rules of Civil Procedure, Court Says in Novel Ruling
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250