Welcome to the New Legal Intelligencer and Law.com!
Welcome to The Legal Intelligencer, part of the new law.com network!We're excited to share improvements we've made to the way we present news…
October 20, 2017 at 11:59 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
Welcome to The Legal Intelligencer, part of the new law.com network! We're excited to share improvements we've made to the way we present news and insights from The Legal, as well as from across the network of ALM legal magazines, journals and newsletters. But let's start with a reassurance: All the content you've come to depend on as a legal practitioner and curious reader remains, right here. We know it's local coverage and insights that keep our thoughtful readers coming back, and we'll continue to provide it—in all the ways to which you've grown accustomed, as well as some new and creative ways. If you're looking at this on your phone, you're already experiencing one of the biggest and most visible improvements, a responsive design allowing you to more easily view and navigate our content. That means it's now simpler than ever to follow breaking news about the Pennsylvania legal community, access special reports like our annual PaLaw magazine and monitor updates to our Filing Fanatics litigation tracker, no matter where you are.
Nevertheless, the finer points of your practice area, or perhaps simply your curiosity, can bring you beyond Pennsylvania's borders. A lawyer who practices class actions and mass torts in Philadelphia as a partner at a midsized firm will want to know what's happening in consequential cases in New Jersey, California, or Illinois courts, items they can find in New Jersey Law Journal, The Recorder or the National Law Journal. That same partner will want insights on how other midsized firms are handling such high-impact issues as rate pressures, mentoring, compensation, diversity and cybersecurity, topics covered by The American Lawyer and our other regional publications. Our reporters and editors across ALM's brands are providing that vital information, every hour. And so the new law.com allows you to access stories from across the universe of ALM legal publications. Our new shared platform allows you to see on law.com the big stories of the moment, as well as all the other recent coverage from all of our reporters, desks and bureaus. If you prefer you can still easily navigate to any of our individual publication home pages, which have been redesigned, to help you drill deeper. We've also made it easier to find and follow the topics that matter to you most. You'll see those topics on all of our article pages, along with other helpful context, and a view of the stories trending with users across our publications.
We've undertaken these improvements with a couple thoughts in mind. First, lawyers today rarely have the luxury of staying in one lane over the course of their career–or even a single work day. A related notion is that the profession itself is under a lot of pressure and is changing rapidly. Our reporters and editors talk to lawyers every day. We know it's more vital than ever that you stay abreast of developments across multiple areas of interest: there's your practice areas or legal specialities; there's your local professional community and your professional networks; and there's the specific organizational roles you fill (or would like to). A lawyer who litigates in Delaware needs to know what's happening in litigation in DE but also in New York, California, Texas if important litigation is occurring around issues she is tracking. DLW is a necessary read but she will also want the latest on big cases across the country–things she can find at The Recorder, the National Law Journal and other regional publications. She'll also benefit from insight into how other midsize firms are handling rate pressure, or the evolving thinking around compensation practices, topics The American Lawyer and other regional publications explore daily. The new law.com platform makes navigating all of those areas of interest easy and intuitive. Please take a few minutes and look around the site and let me know what you think.
Zack Needles
Managing Editor
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDiversity Data Is More Than Just Numbers on a Spreadsheet
'Bush v. Gore' Drew Passionate Demonstrators; That's Not What I See Today
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250