Allen & Overy drawn into Weinstein scandal with role for Miramax on non-disclosure agreement
FT article exposes magic circle firm's role advising Miramax in 1998
October 24, 2017 at 05:23 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Allen & Overy (A&O) has been drawn into the sexual harassment scandal surrounding Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein, after details emerged of the firm's historic role advising Miramax in relation to claims made against Weinstein 19 years ago.
The magic circle firm was drafted in to advise Miramax when the producer's then assistant Zelda Perkins accused him of sexual harassment in 1998.
A&O's role was revealed in a Financial Times article published yesterday, which states that Perkins' lawyers Simons Muirhead & Burton advised her, and a colleague accusing Weinstein of sexual assault, to seek a damages agreement against Weinstein.
In the FT article, Perkins recounts visiting A&O's City office to discuss a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) that the firm drew up as part of the settlement, including a £250,000 payout to be split between the two women.
Allen & Overy declined to confirm details of its role, however the FT article names London employment partner Mark Mansell as playing a key role in the negotiations.
Perkins' decision to breach the terms of the NDA follows weeks of revelations against the disgraced Hollywood mogul, following an investigation by the New York Times.
According to sources, A&O's role for Miramax was a one-off, with the FT report stating that among other clauses in the NDA Perkins was required to contact Mansell if she was ever required to give evidence in "any criminal legal process" involving Weinstein or Miramax.
However, the FT article states she decided to breach the terms of the agreement in order to raise awareness of the NDA process.
Perkins is quoted in the article explaining her decision by saying: "I want to publicly break my non-disclosure agreement. Unless somebody does this there won't be a debate about how egregious these agreements are and the amount of duress that victims are put under. My entire world fell in because I thought the law was there to protect those who abided by it. I discovered that it had nothing to do with right and wrong and everything to do with money and power."
So far, about 50 women have accused Weinstein of a range of offences, including harassment and rape.
A recent Legal Week survey into sexual harassment at law firms found two thirds of female lawyers have experienced some form of sexual harassment while working in a law firm.
A&O declined to comment. Simons Muirhead & Burton was contacted for comment.
|- If you have a story you are willing to share (in confidence) about sexual harassment you've experienced in a law firm please get in touch by emailing Georgina Stanley at [email protected]
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKeller Postman and Jenner & Block Accuse Each Other of Unethical Actions in Tubi Settlement
7 minute readGoing, Going, Gone! Florida Lawyers Up to Bat After Baseball Shatters Sales Records
JAMS Launches Initiative to Leverage AI Technology in Dispute Resolution
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250