Ashurst leads top 10 for partner diversity as stats show dearth of BAME lawyers among senior ranks
Newly compiled figures reveal UK's 10 largest law firms have on average just 7% black, Asian and minority ethnic UK partners
November 01, 2017 at 10:44 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Ashurst has the highest percentage of black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) UK partners of the country's 10 largest law firms, according to new research, which also reveals that those firms have an average of just 7% of UK partners from minority ethnic backgrounds.
Figures provided to Legal Week by nine of the UK top 10 place Ashurst ahead of its peers on partner diversity, with 11% of the firm's UK partners identifying as BAME in 2017.
At all of the other eight firms to have provided figures*, the percentage stands at less than 10%, with Allen & Overy (A&O) second on 9% and Linklaters third with 8.9%.
The figures compare unfavourably with the UK-wide BAME proportion of 13% of the general population recorded in the last census in 2011, a figure that rises to about 40% in London, where the majority of partners at major UK law firms are based.
The latest figures from the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) show 16% of UK solicitors identified as BAME when research was carried out in 2016.
Legal Week's data shows firms are making progress in improving diversity lower down their ranks, even if their partnerships have yet to catch up.
Clifford Chance has the highest proportion of BAME non-partner lawyers among the UK top 10, with just under 30% of the firm's UK lawyers identifying as BAME in 2017. However, this figure falls to 5.1% for its partnership.
Closely behind, 28% of A&O's trainees and 23% of its associates are BAME, while 24% of Ashurst's associates are from minority ethnic backgrounds.
Within the top 10, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer has the lowest proportion of UK BAME partners at 3.4%, with the equivalent figure for associates standing at 13.5%.
Ashurst London private equity partner David Carter said: "I think law firms generally have sensible proces
"Law firms understand that. Progress is slow; it takes time to build a law firm into a shape that is attractive to more diverse candidates as well as educating people about those opportunities."
The lack of BAME representation at the largest UK firms is also an issue in the wider legal sector, according to a study released yesterday (31 October) by the SRA. This found that career progression remains an issue both for ethnic minority lawyers and women in the UK. White male solicitors are six times more likely to make partner than ethnic minority women and three times more likely than white women.
It also found that there has been a significant increase in the number of BAME lawyers entering the profession in the last three decades, with the percentage of solicitors identifying as BAME standing at just 0.25% in 1982, compared to the latest figure of 16%.
The independent research was carried out by the University of Leeds and Newcastle University Business School, which analysed data for more than 194,000 solicitors between 1970 and 2016.
Raph Mokades, managing director of the Rare specialist recruitment agency, said: "Whether or not a formal target is set is not the most important question [when it comes to boosting diversity]. The key thing is that the number of BAME partners is regularly reviewed and compared to industry and population norms. Regular measurement ensures that partner diversity stays a key focus.
"Secondly, firms need to make proactive efforts to ensure diversity in their trainee and associate hiring, in order to have a diverse pipeline. And thirdly, just looking at the numbers and hiring diversity lower down won't on their own produce more diverse partnerships. The final piece of the puzzle is ensuring that the partner identification and promotion process is bias-free."
Percentage of BAME partners at the UK top 10 firms:
- Ashurst: 11%
- Allen & Overy: 9%
- Linklaters: 8.9%
- Norton Rose Fulbright: 8%
- DLA Piper: 7%
- Clifford Chance: 5.1%
- Herbert Smith Freehills: 5%
- CMS UK: 5%
- Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer: 3.4%
*Both Linklaters and Freshfields have yet to report 2017 figures so the data for these firms is for 2016. Hogan Lovells was the only UK top 10 firm that declined to provide ethnicity data.
- Diversity is on the agenda at LegalWeek Connect, with a panel featuring Santa Fe GC Janet McCarthy, PayPal legal chief Louise Pentland and partners from CMS, Hogan Lovells, Fieldfisher and Eversheds Sutherland set to discuss the key issues for law firms. Click here to find out more.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllT14 Sees Black, Hispanic Law Student Representation Decline Following End of Affirmative Action
Former CEO Allowed to Proceed with Discrimination Suit Against Commercial Litigation Funder, Judge Rules
4 minute readHow Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250