Freshfields partners vote in extended single lockstep ladder to boost pay for star performers
Freshfields partners vote overwhelmingly in favour of new single lockstep ladder peaking at around £3m for top earners
November 14, 2017 at 11:47 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Freshfields Bruckhaus Derigner is set to scrap its current lockstep system and instead introduce a new single ladder that will enable top performers to make six times more than those at the bottom.
Partners voted through the new system today (14 November) after six weeks of debate, and it will come into effect at the start of the new financial year in May.
It will see all partners joining the lockstep at 12 points, with a new top of lockstep rising to 60 points.
The core ladder will run from 12 points to 40 points, with everything above this only applying to star performers and those in competitive markets such as New York. Elsewhere, partners will climb to various points on the ladder depending on factors such as geography and practice group.
There will be three gates in the system where the firm will be able to either pause partners' progress or stop them from climbing higher. In theory, the firm will also be able to move partners down the lockstep from a gateway position, something it was previously unable to do. Only the very top performers will be able to clear the third gate to reach the new 60-point plateau.
The overhaul scraps the current system, which comprises a main ladder running from 17.5 to 50 points and a lower ladder for less profitable jurisdictions and practices, which runs from 10 to 30 points. A handful of partners in offices such as New York have also received above-lockstep deals.
While the changes mean that all partners will be joining the lockstep at a lower level and will take longer to reach the top, the value per point is understood to be about 20% higher, meaning the difference in pay between 17.5 points and 12 points will not be as big as under the current system.
Under the current system, a point is budgeted to be worth about £40,000 for the current financial year but this will be rebased to nearer £50,000, taking the 60-point top of the lockstep to about £3m, compared to about £2.2m for top earners at present.
Those at the top of the core 40-point plateau will make about £2m, based on current budgeted point values.
Partners will climb the ladder by the same number of points each year until the core ladder ends, at which point the increments are thought to get bigger.
Ninety one percent of partners voted on the new package, with 94% of them voting in favour of the changes.
Freshfields senior partner Edward Braham said: "We felt this was the right time to look closely at our lockstep. The partners have engaged, consulted and voted positively for the new structure, which now cements our model for the foreseeable future.
"We are an ambitious, confident and aligned partnership and we are in a very positive place to make the most of the many opportunities we have."
All partners will now see their positions on the lockstep reviewed ahead of the 1 May introduction of the new system.
Freshfields has been reviewing the performance of a number of its partners in recent years, with Legal Week reporting in January 2016 that many partners faced having their profit shares cut in a bid to ramp up profitability.
At that point, a number of partners in less profitable practices and offices moved down to the second tier lockstep ladder.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's Second Term Spurs Unusual Alliances Between US and European Law Firms
3 minute readGoodwin to Launch Brussels Office With Quinn Emanuel Antitrust Partner
3 minute readDespite Brexit, UK Lawyers Still Dominate on Big EU Antitrust Lawsuits
7 minute readHow to Litigate Before the EU’s Top Court, the European Court of Justice
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250