General Counsel Looking to Increase Outside Counsel Spend in 2018
This year a common post-recession trend—a decrease in outside counsel spend—appears to be moving in reverse.
November 14, 2017 at 04:50 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
For the first time since 2007, more in-house legal departments plan increases rather than decreases in outside counsel spending next year, according to the 2017 Chief Legal Officer Survey from Altman Weil Inc.
This is the 18th year that Altman Weil, which provides management consulting services to legal organizations, has conducted the survey. Respondents included 280 law department leaders from companies of all sizes.
The report said 40 percent of respondents plan to increase their outside counsel spend in 2018, while only 33 percent anticipate a decrease. While that hasn't happened since before the financial crisis of 2008, the report said the gap between internal and outside counsel spend has been narrowing over the last three years.
“After years of belt-tightening, perhaps some of the [financial] pressure is easing,” said Rees Morrison, an Altman Weil principal and co-author of the report. “And perhaps some people are just being more honest. For years it's been politically correct to say they were doing more with less every year.”
Morrison said one of the most important takeaways for general counsel from the report is a range of techniques for managing both internal efficiency and spend on outside counsel. “The range has different applicability, depending on your department's size and personal philosophy of management,” he explained.
About 79 percent of the legal departments said they provide billing and expense guidelines to their outside counsel. When asked what techniques were most effective in managing outside counsel, enforcing these guidelines was the top answer.
But despite respondents' enthusiasm about this tactic, only 60 percent said they routinely enforce their guidelines.
“To set standards and then fail to enforce them is an obvious and unnecessary omission—and one that should not stand in any law department that is serious about effectively managing law firms,” the report chastised.
Asked what percentage of outside counsel fees last year were for work that could have been done by many different law firms, the median response was 41 percent to 50 percent. This suggests “that law departments have considerable negotiating power,” the report added.
Morrison noted, “It may be that many law firms can do a fair portion of your work, but you still have to find them and get comfortable with them. It doesn't mean we know who they are.”
The report also found:
• Some 45 percent of law departments increased total spend in 2017; 36 percent decreased spend, and for 19 percent it stayed the same.
• But in larger law departments—with over 50 lawyers—only 22 percent increased their total spend in 2017 while 50 percent made cuts.
• The top cost control technique last year was price reductions from outside counsel, reported by 64 percent of all respondents and by 78 percent of the larger departments.
• The most frequently used efficiency tactic was a greater use of technology tools, cited by 58 percent of all respondents and by 81 percent of the larger departments.
• Outsourcing to non-law firm vendors scored highest in effectiveness to achieve efficiency and cost control, but was one of the least-used tactics.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAllies Wanted: After $100M Victory, These Lawyers Seek to Bolster Plaintiff's Bar
5 minute readWith 'Fractional' C-Suite Advisers, Midsize Firms Balance Expertise With Expense
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250