Ireland launches post-Brexit charm offensive to convince more law firms to launch in Dublin
Irish Development Agency leads talks with managing partners at international firms
November 14, 2017 at 03:58 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The Irish Development Agency (IDA) has launched a charm offensive to promote the appeal of Ireland as a legal centre and encourage international law firms to launch in Dublin.
The IDA, the state body responsible for attracting foreign direct investment to Ireland, is working with Irish government agencies to convince firms of the benefits of having a base in Dublin.
Managing partners at leading UK and international law firms in London have confirmed that the IDA has approached them to discuss Dublin's appeal as a potential office location, particularly in the light of the UK's upcoming withdrawal from the European Union.
One managing partner at a global firm said: "The IDA has been to talks with lots of law firms. It wasn't so much to say you must come to Ireland; plainly they are saying that. It was more to say if you ever have a willingness to come, we can be helpful and navigate regulatory issues."
IDA senior vice-president for technology, consumer and business services Shane Nolan confirmed that the agency has been approaching law firms, adding that it was working alongside the Irish Department of Justice, the Irish Law Society and the Irish Bar Council.
Nolan said: "We still don't want Brexit to happen; we'd rather it was all a bad dream. But if people have to move to gain access to the European market, we'd rather they came here than anywhere else in Europe, and legal services is no different to other sectors."
He said the IDA has been talking to "a good chunk of the top firms" in the UK, in particular firms with an international focus, as the IDA has a specific mandate to boost cross-border trade and investment by foreign-owned companies.
"A wide variety of firms in the UK will have a tidy domestic business; we have nothing really of value to offer them – our focus is on international firms," he said.
Three firms have confirmed plans to open in Dublin since the Brexit vote in June 2016: Pinsent Masons, Covington & Burling and Simmons & Simmons, while Fieldfisher is also seriously considering a launch in the city.
Nolan predicted that more international firms are likely to follow. "I would imagine there will be more, based on the conversations we are having and where those firms are in those decision-making processes," he said.
In addition to law firms opening Irish offices, English-qualified solicitors have been joining the Irish roll of solicitors in increasing numbers, both before and after the Brexit vote. According to the Irish Law Society, 459 solicitors from England and Wales were admitted to the Irish roll of solicitors in 2017, while 806 were admitted in 2016. Prior to the Brexit vote, about 50 to 100 would join the roll in a typical year.
Irish Bar Council member Patrick Leonard SC, who is coordinating the Bar of Ireland's efforts to promote the use of Irish law, echoed Nolan's comments: "We expect to see an increase in the amount of legal work done in Ireland as a consequence of Brexit. We expect to see more US and English firms setting up in Ireland, and we are already seeing a small number of UK barristers applying to join the Bar of Ireland," he said.
Nolan said seven barristers from England and Wales had joined the Irish Bar this year.
Separately, Pinsent Masons recently announced that it had signed a lease for 9,800 sq ft of office space in Dublin, which Pinsents partner and board member Joanne Ellis confirmed could house up to 70 staff and 10-12 partners.
Ellis said: "The Dublin market has been incredibly encouraging towards Pinsents; we couldn't have been made to feel more welcome and have had huge amount of support from the Law Society of Ireland, the IDA, other industry bodies and our advisers on the ground."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's Second Term Spurs Unusual Alliances Between US and European Law Firms
3 minute readGoodwin to Launch Brussels Office With Quinn Emanuel Antitrust Partner
3 minute readDespite Brexit, UK Lawyers Still Dominate on Big EU Antitrust Lawsuits
7 minute readHow to Litigate Before the EU’s Top Court, the European Court of Justice
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250