Ireland launches post-Brexit charm offensive to convince more law firms to launch in Dublin
Irish Development Agency leads talks with managing partners at international firms
November 14, 2017 at 03:58 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The Irish Development Agency (IDA) has launched a charm offensive to promote the appeal of Ireland as a legal centre and encourage international law firms to launch in Dublin.
The IDA, the state body responsible for attracting foreign direct investment to Ireland, is working with Irish government agencies to convince firms of the benefits of having a base in Dublin.
Managing partners at leading UK and international law firms in London have confirmed that the IDA has approached them to discuss Dublin's appeal as a potential office location, particularly in the light of the UK's upcoming withdrawal from the European Union.
One managing partner at a global firm said: "The IDA has been to talks with lots of law firms. It wasn't so much to say you must come to Ireland; plainly they are saying that. It was more to say if you ever have a willingness to come, we can be helpful and navigate regulatory issues."
IDA senior vice-president for technology, consumer and business services Shane Nolan confirmed that the agency has been approaching law firms, adding that it was working alongside the Irish Department of Justice, the Irish Law Society and the Irish Bar Council.
Nolan said: "We still don't want Brexit to happen; we'd rather it was all a bad dream. But if people have to move to gain access to the European market, we'd rather they came here than anywhere else in Europe, and legal services is no different to other sectors."
He said the IDA has been talking to "a good chunk of the top firms" in the UK, in particular firms with an international focus, as the IDA has a specific mandate to boost cross-border trade and investment by foreign-owned companies.
"A wide variety of firms in the UK will have a tidy domestic business; we have nothing really of value to offer them – our focus is on international firms," he said.
Three firms have confirmed plans to open in Dublin since the Brexit vote in June 2016: Pinsent Masons, Covington & Burling and Simmons & Simmons, while Fieldfisher is also seriously considering a launch in the city.
Nolan predicted that more international firms are likely to follow. "I would imagine there will be more, based on the conversations we are having and where those firms are in those decision-making processes," he said.
In addition to law firms opening Irish offices, English-qualified solicitors have been joining the Irish roll of solicitors in increasing numbers, both before and after the Brexit vote. According to the Irish Law Society, 459 solicitors from England and Wales were admitted to the Irish roll of solicitors in 2017, while 806 were admitted in 2016. Prior to the Brexit vote, about 50 to 100 would join the roll in a typical year.
Irish Bar Council member Patrick Leonard SC, who is coordinating the Bar of Ireland's efforts to promote the use of Irish law, echoed Nolan's comments: "We expect to see an increase in the amount of legal work done in Ireland as a consequence of Brexit. We expect to see more US and English firms setting up in Ireland, and we are already seeing a small number of UK barristers applying to join the Bar of Ireland," he said.
Nolan said seven barristers from England and Wales had joined the Irish Bar this year.
Separately, Pinsent Masons recently announced that it had signed a lease for 9,800 sq ft of office space in Dublin, which Pinsents partner and board member Joanne Ellis confirmed could house up to 70 staff and 10-12 partners.
Ellis said: "The Dublin market has been incredibly encouraging towards Pinsents; we couldn't have been made to feel more welcome and have had huge amount of support from the Law Society of Ireland, the IDA, other industry bodies and our advisers on the ground."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Under Fire for Human Rights Assessment of Saudi Arabia World Cup Bid
5 minute readThe Week in Data Nov. 7: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Trump Win Ignites Global Legal Market: Lawyers Prepare for High Demand & Uncertainty
Netflix Offices Raided by Authorities in Paris and Amsterdam
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250