Pinsents sued by Spanish firm Ramon & Cajal over Madrid partner hires after unsuccessful merger talks
Pinsents senior partner Richard Foley and TMT head Clive Seddon named as defendants
November 30, 2017 at 09:49 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Pinsent Masons is being sued by Spanish firm Ramon & Cajal, over allegations that it breached a number of agreements by hiring a team of its partners and associates following unsuccessful merger talks between the two firms.
Documents filed at London's High Court detail the Spanish firm's claim against Pinsents, which also names the firm's senior partner Richard Foley, TMT head Clive Seddon and Madrid head and former Ramon board member Diego Lozano as defendants.
According to the claim, Pinsents and Ramon engaged in merger talks between October and December 2016, culminating in a merger offer made to Ramon on 19 December.
Ramon equity partners rejected the offer by a majority on 21 December. Managing partner Francisco Pala communicated the decision to Foley the following day and asked him to consider an alliance between the two firms instead, according to the document.
The claim states that between January and May 2017, Pinsents agreed to hire five Ramon partners, all seven of its full-time corporate associates and two banking associates.
It also states that Pinsents tried to hire Ramon banking partner Cristina Vida, but she rebuffed their approaches.
The partners that joined Pinsents were Lozano, who had played a key part in the negotiations between the two firms, corporate partners Sanchez Montero and Inmaculada Castello Bernabeu, finance partner Idoya Arteagabeitia and litigation partner Fernando Gutierrez.
Ramon argues that the hires breached a no-hiring provision contained in a memorandum of understanding between the two firms signed in July 2016, and also breached a non-solicitation provision in a non-disclosure agreement between the firms signed in October 2016.
It also claims that Pinsents used confidential data provided to them in the merger talks between the two firms, including which of its partners had the most profitable practice and which of its clients were the most profitable, in its solicitation of its lawyers.
According to the documents, Lozano and Sanchez Montero were two of the firm's three most profitable partners.
As evidence of the alleged solicitation, the firm points to a presentation given by Seddon to a group of its associates at the Hesperia Hotel in Madrid, where he pitched Pinsents' vision for its Madrid office in an attempt to get them to join the firm.
According to the documents, this included its intention to invest €10m (£8.8m) in its Madrid office with a view to engaging at least 60 lawyers in the forthcoming five years.
Ramon is claiming that, but for the defendants' actions, its lawyers would still be working for the firm and generating profits, and that it is entitled to claim these lost profits in addition to any profits made by the defendants as a result of their breach of confidence.
It also claims that Lozano is obliged to disgorge to the firm any gain received by him as a result of his breach of duty to the firm.
A Pinsents spokesperson said: "We are disappointed by this litigation, which we do not believe has merit. As we build our business, we take great care to meet the responsibilities we agree to as part of our discussions with individuals and firms alike. We believe we have always met our responsibilities in relation to Ramon & Cajal and regret they have chosen to take this action. Given formal proceedings are underway, it would not be appropriate for us to make further comment."
Ramon has instructed Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan partner Richard East, while Pinsents has turned to Ashurst litigation partner James Levy.
Pinsents opened its Madrid office in May with the Ramon partner hires, who were joined by projects and construction partner Ricardo Garcia from construction firm OHL and construction partner Sofia Parra, who relocated from Pinsents' London office.
Quinn declined to comment. Ramon was contacted for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGoing, Going, Gone! Florida Lawyers Up to Bat After Baseball Shatters Sales Records
JAMS Launches Initiative to Leverage AI Technology in Dispute Resolution
Federal Judge Preliminarily Approves $10M Settlement Against Citgo's 'Marriage Penalty' in Pensions Benefits
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Commission Confirms Three of Newsom's Appellate Court Picks
- 2Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 3GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 4'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 5Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250