Students From UPenn, Other Elite Law Schools Vow to Combat Mental Health Suffering on Campuses
"Students left behind are not failures of personal strength. They are testaments to our collective failure to uplift one another and raise the standards of our trade."
December 01, 2017 at 05:23 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The student leaders from 13 of the nation's top law schools have pledged to broaden mental health initiatives on their campuses and to fight the stigma of seeking treatment.
The pledge comes at a time that law schools nationwide have launched initiatives to address students' mental health struggles, in the wake of several eye-popping studies showing the levels of anxiety, depression and substance abuse among both law students and practicing lawyers are far surpassing the general population. Read the pledge here.
“Students left behind are not failures of personal strength. They are testaments to our collective failure to uplift one another and raise the standards of our trade,” states the letter signed by student government presidents from 13 of the so-called T-14 law schools. Those signing the letter come from Yale Law School, Stanford Law School, Harvard Law School, the University of Chicago Law School, Columbia Law School, New York University School of Law, the University of Pennsylvania Law School, the University of Michigan Law School, Duke University School of Law, Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law, the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, Cornell Law School and the University of Texas School of Law.
The student presidents wrote that it's become an accepted, stereotypical assumption that students will see a toll on their mental health while in law school. But poor health shouldn't be seen as a necessary byproduct of legal education—it must be treated “as the scourge of the profession that it is.”
We spoke with Chris O'Brien, president of the Council of Student Representatives at Penn Law, who initiated the conversation about the pledge in an online group composed of the student government presidents of the T-14 law schools. Here are his answers, edited for brevity and clarity.
What's the story behind how some of the student body presidents of the T-14 law schools decided to collaborate on this mental health pledge?
There are many factors that went into this initial conversation, stemming from incidents that all our schools have had in the past of mental health issues—student suicides at both undergraduate schools and the law schools themselves. There have been initiatives taken by the law schools to address these concerns, but they are somewhat slow to respond. Not to fault anyone, but these issues seem to take a back burner to what is more pressing to many schools: their statistics and success rates and job placements and clerkship placements and all these other things. There have been pretty extraordinary things happening in the last few years, but we wanted to stand together in solidarity and say these issues are real and affect our communities. We want the law schools to hold them in the same regard as they hold their employment statistics and LSAT scores.
Why is this the right time to do this?
More and more has come out in the last few years to show that the prevalence of mental health issues in law school and the legal profession is much higher than people originally knew, especially at big law firms where people work 60 to 80 hours a week. Many of these patterns develop in law school and are continued into the legal profession. We get into a pattern: high pressure, high stakes, anxiety, depression. In law school, we drink a lot, because we enjoy each others' company, and often we continue to drink in order to combat some of these issues, which is extremely unhealthy. It becomes important as leaders in our law schools to bring attention to these issues now and have our law school communities address them. By the time we are done with law school, a lot of these patterns have been established.
What mental health struggles do law students go through?
The most typical is anxiety and depression. One thing about the top 14 law schools: These are all incredibly high-performing individuals and you don't get to that level without an incredible amount of pressure placed on you and incredibly high workloads. Many of my classmates, they went to elite private schools, elite undergrad institutions, now they are at elite law schools. These people have dealt with extreme workloads and pressure since they were young teenagers, and probably before that. At a certain point, I think it would help us all to slow down and get some perspective as to what is important. Perhaps what is more important is our mental health—our well-being. So many of the people from these law schools will go on to hold very powerful and important positions. It's incumbent on us to ensure those future leaders are healthy and happy.
Angela Morris is a freelance reporter. Follow her on Twitter: @AMorrisReports
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Discordant Dots': Why Phila. Zantac Judge Rejected Bid for His Recusal
3 minute readPlaintiffs Seek Redo of First Trial Over Medical Device Plant's Emissions
4 minute readJudges Push for Action to Combat Increasing Threats Against Judiciary
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1SDNY Criminal Division Deputy Chief Returns to Debevoise
- 2Brownstein Adds Former Interior Secretary, Offering 'Strategic Counsel' During New Trump Term
- 3Tragedy on I-95: Florida Lawsuit Against Horizon Freight System Could Set New Precedent in Crash Cases
- 4Weil, Loading Up on More Regulatory Talent, Adds SEC Asset Management Co-Chief
- 5Big Banks Did Great Last Year. What Does That Mean for Big Law?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250