Law School Applications on the Rise
As of Dec. 1, the number of law school applicants was up by 12 percent while the number of applications was up by 15 percent.
December 07, 2017 at 03:22 PM
6 minute read
Just in time for the new year, law schools have cause to celebrate.
As of Dec. 1, the number of law school applicants was up by 12 percent to 16,784, compared with this time last year, while the number of applications was up by 15 percent to 93,932, according to the Law School Admission Council.
Granted, it might be too early in the application season to declare a definitive upward trend for the next academic year, since around this time last year, only 27 percent of the total applicants had submitted their applications.
Still, the numbers are in line with the hope law schools expressed earlier this year after LSAC data showed that in September, 37,100 people took the LSAT, a 10.7 percent increase over September 2016. And in June, 27,600 people took the LSAT, a 19.8 percent jump compared with June 2016.
As of Dec. 1, the number of people who registered to take the LSAT this month was up by 26 percent compared with last year, said Kellye Testy, president and CEO of the LSAC.
“I think it's very promising. We were pleased to see the increase in people taking the LSAT has now translated into an increase in people applying to school,” Testy said. “Our member schools are certainly happy to see it: They had many years of it going down or staying flat, so they are pleased to see the renewed interest.”
An increase in applicant numbers would be a welcome departure from recent history. The number of applicants has plummeted by at least 33 percent over the last 10 years from 84,000 in 2007 to 56,500 in 2016. More applicants could translate into more top-performing students for law schools to recruit.
Testy said the current political climate in the United States is motivating students, whether they support President Donald Trump or oppose him, to consider the law as a career. Also, historically speaking, it's a normal cycle for the numbers of applicants to increase and decrease.
“We had predicted we were at the bottom, and we would tick up. We are seeing that, and I'm going to hope it will continue to move that direction,” Testy said.
But Jeff Thomas, executive director of prelaw programs at Kaplan Test Prep, who watches these trends closely, said it's still too early to tell whether applications will level out as the application season continues through next year. He pointed out that LSAT administration this fall came one week early, which could help applicants turn in their applications seven to 10 days early, leading to an artificial increase. As the season moves on, the numbers could normalize. But if they increase steadily instead, Thomas said it could mean more competition among applicants.
“Just because applications go up doesn't mean law schools will increase the size of their classes. In fact, I suspect it will not be the case,” he said.
Angela Morris is a freelance reporter. Follow her on Twitter @AMorrisReports
Just in time for the new year, law schools have cause to celebrate.
As of Dec. 1, the number of law school applicants was up by 12 percent to 16,784, compared with this time last year, while the number of applications was up by 15 percent to 93,932, according to the Law School Admission Council.
Granted, it might be too early in the application season to declare a definitive upward trend for the next academic year, since around this time last year, only 27 percent of the total applicants had submitted their applications.
Still, the numbers are in line with the hope law schools expressed earlier this year after LSAC data showed that in September, 37,100 people took the LSAT, a 10.7 percent increase over September 2016. And in June, 27,600 people took the LSAT, a 19.8 percent jump compared with June 2016.
As of Dec. 1, the number of people who registered to take the LSAT this month was up by 26 percent compared with last year, said Kellye Testy, president and CEO of the LSAC.
“I think it's very promising. We were pleased to see the increase in people taking the LSAT has now translated into an increase in people applying to school,” Testy said. “Our member schools are certainly happy to see it: They had many years of it going down or staying flat, so they are pleased to see the renewed interest.”
An increase in applicant numbers would be a welcome departure from recent history. The number of applicants has plummeted by at least 33 percent over the last 10 years from 84,000 in 2007 to 56,500 in 2016. More applicants could translate into more top-performing students for law schools to recruit.
Testy said the current political climate in the United States is motivating students, whether they support President Donald Trump or oppose him, to consider the law as a career. Also, historically speaking, it's a normal cycle for the numbers of applicants to increase and decrease.
“We had predicted we were at the bottom, and we would tick up. We are seeing that, and I'm going to hope it will continue to move that direction,” Testy said.
But Jeff Thomas, executive director of prelaw programs at Kaplan Test Prep, who watches these trends closely, said it's still too early to tell whether applications will level out as the application season continues through next year. He pointed out that LSAT administration this fall came one week early, which could help applicants turn in their applications seven to 10 days early, leading to an artificial increase. As the season moves on, the numbers could normalize. But if they increase steadily instead, Thomas said it could mean more competition among applicants.
“Just because applications go up doesn't mean law schools will increase the size of their classes. In fact, I suspect it will not be the case,” he said.
Angela Morris is a freelance reporter. Follow her on Twitter @AMorrisReports
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUChicago Law Professors Release Desk Reference Breaking Down Crypto, Web 3 for Attorneys
4 minute readDean Developments: 2 Law Schools Appoint New Leadership, ABF Elects New Fellow
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250