The Careerist: What!?! You Didn't Make that Best Lawyer List?
Stop giving women lawyers dubious awards and start making them partner, writes Vivia Chen in the final Careerist briefing of 2017.
December 22, 2017 at 12:00 PM
6 minute read
|
Oh, Joy! Another “Best” Women Lawyer List!
Look who else is crowding into the female lawyer franchise? Crain's just launched its inaugural list of 100 “Leading Women Lawyers in New York City” and 60 “Leading Women Lawyers in Chicago.”
Quick! Check out who's on it (or not). If your lawyer made the list, she must be awesome! If not, ask for a discount!
Folks, how can anyone take this stuff seriously?
Let's start with the obvious: These “best,” “leading” or “top” women's list strike me as sexist. Can you imagine publishing a list of the 100 “Leading Men Lawyers in New York”? People would think it's a parody.
Second, I have no faith in how Crain's or anyone else makes these selections. (We know firms submit their own candidates.) While there are lots of well-known women on the lists, there are also plenty of omissions. (Don't get me started.)
So what's the criteria for this honor? I'd describe it as “fuzzy.” For its New York list, Crain's calls its picks “trailblazers” who “juggle both distinguished careers and exceptional civic and philanthropic activities.” For its Chicago list, Crain's says the winners made “a point to mentor other women lawyers and to give back to their community in myriad ways.”
I don't know how Crain's measured “distinguished careers” or “exceptional civic and philanthropic activities” or giving back “in myriad ways,” except that it all sounds like something cooked up by some marketing maven to stage an overpriced, dreadfully dull awards gala to which colleagues and family will feel obligated to attend.
Look on the bright side: It gives everyone an excuse to buy another swanky evening dress or tuxedo.
|
➤➤ Sign up here and get the next Careerist briefing straight to your in-box.
|
Kudos to Jenner & Block
I must be getting soft. For the second week in a row, I have something nice to say about a firm. (Last week it was DLA Piper's Toronto office.)
This time, it's Jenner & Block, which just announced 13 new partners, and the class consists of eight women and five men. That's an impressive margin of ladies!
Here are the new partners:
Clifford Berlow
Christine Bowman
Jason Bradford
Penelope Campbell
Jeremy Casper
Brienne Letourneau
Jennifer Senior
Sarah Weiss
James Woolrich
David Lachman
Laura MacDonald
Emily Loeb
Devi Rao
Even more impressive, this is not the first time that women's promotions have outnumbered those of men at the firm. In 2015, it also promoted eight women and five men. (Last year, it slipped slightly, elevating eight women and 10 men.)
Hey, if a solid firm like Jenner & Block can produce these results, what's wrong with the rest of you?
|
Jones Day Alum Gets the Boot
Sorry, folks, I'm not referring to Don McGahn, the erstwhile Jones Day partner who's now running the White House Counsel office and shaping the judiciary to his personal liking. (McGahn tried to fill two federal judgeships with his cronies—Brett Talley and Matthew Petersen—but both withdrew because they were too blatantly incompetent. Don't worry, McGahn's got a lot more buddies in pipeline.)
The Jones Day alum who's in trouble is Chaka Patterson who left the firm with fanfare to be Cook County's assistant state attorney and chief of the Civil Actions Bureau in Illinois. For a while it was a great ride for Jones Day, because Patterson fed his former firm lots of business from Cook County.
Maybe too much business.
Patterson recently resigned from his post after an internal inquiry found that he was perhaps too generous to his former firms. Meghan Tribe in The American Lawyer reports that “Patterson reportedly referred two cases—a federal job discrimination suit and a federal wrongful conviction matter—to Jones Day at a rate of up to $500 per hour.”
Getting billed for $500 an hour might seem like small change for a Fortune 500 company, but this is Cook County, which is already under financial pressure. Plus, “the firm has already billed for more than $464,000.” (It should be noted that there was no finding of wrong doing on the part of Jones Day.)
I don't know if Patterson will get his job back at Jones Day, because the firm isn't talking. Though he left his government job under a cloud, it seems Jones Day owes it to him to take him back. I mean, he did get in trouble because he was (too) nice to his old firm.
|
Hey, I'd Like to See His Tax Returns
He didn't go to fancy law school (ever heard of St. Mary's Law School?) nor has he ever worked in fancy law firm, but boy is he rolling in dough.
How much dough? Try this: Texas personal injury lawyer Thomas Henryreportedly just spent $4 million on his son's 18th birthday party. And there's more: His son also got a “blue Ferrari, an IWC Portugieser Tourbillion watch and a custom-made painting from Alec Monopoly,” reports Corpus Christi's Caller Times.
My first reaction? That's insane and obscene. My second reaction: Wow, that PI lawyer must make an unfathomable amount of money. And again, the adjectives “insane” and “obscene” pop into mind.
I never thought I'd feel sorry for all you Big Law partners, but I do. Some of you are slaving away and taking home a mere $1 million or so–and you consider that respectable. If you're bagging over $3 million, you probably feel super special, like the elite of the elites. And if you're making $5 million or more, you think you're a lotto winner.
But this guy in Texas blasts everyone out of the water. He blows $4 million on a party for a teenager—and this is hardly his only extravagance (he reportedly spent $6 million for his daughter's party). You can bill until your blue in the face, and you will never, ever get close to that level.
Hat tip: Above the Law
Thanks for reading The Careerist. Check out other new Law.com briefings and sign up here.
See you after the holidays in two weeks!
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInside Track: Late-Career In-House Leaders Offer Words to Live by
Which 1-Judge Division Districts Have Adopted Anti-Forum Shopping Guidance?
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250